2017
DOI: 10.3390/met7080319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of Ti55 High-Temperature Titanium Alloy

Abstract: Abstract:The isothermal compression experiment of as-rolled Ti-55 alloy was carried out on a Gleeble-3800 thermal simulation test machine at the deformation temperature range of 700-1050 • C and strain rate range of 0.001-1 s −1 . The hot deformation behavior and the microstructure evolution were analyzed during thermal compression. The results show that the apparent activation energy Q in α + β dual-phase region and β single-phase region were calculated to be 453.00 KJ/mol and 279.88 KJ/mol, respectively. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hot deformation activation energy of SP-700 alloy in the α + β region was higher than in the single-phase β region (305 kJ•mol −1 vs. 165 kJ•mol −1 ) due to the dynamic globularization of the lamellar α phase [60]. A similar increase in Q value due to the formation of the α phase was observed for several titanium alloys: 495 kJ•mol −1 in the α + β region vs. 196 kJ•mol −1 in the β region for a Cu-bearing antibacterial Ti-645 alloy [61], 453 kJ•mol −1 vs. 280 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-55 high-temperature alloy [62], 617 kJ•mol −1 vs. 149 kJ•mol −1 for a TC8M-1 alloy [63], 589 kJ•mol −1 vs. 226 kJ•mol −1 a TA15 alloy [64], 292 kJ•mol −1 vs. 180 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy [65], 275 kJ•mol −1 vs. 148 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-1Zr alloy [66].…”
Section: Hot Deformation Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The hot deformation activation energy of SP-700 alloy in the α + β region was higher than in the single-phase β region (305 kJ•mol −1 vs. 165 kJ•mol −1 ) due to the dynamic globularization of the lamellar α phase [60]. A similar increase in Q value due to the formation of the α phase was observed for several titanium alloys: 495 kJ•mol −1 in the α + β region vs. 196 kJ•mol −1 in the β region for a Cu-bearing antibacterial Ti-645 alloy [61], 453 kJ•mol −1 vs. 280 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-55 high-temperature alloy [62], 617 kJ•mol −1 vs. 149 kJ•mol −1 for a TC8M-1 alloy [63], 589 kJ•mol −1 vs. 226 kJ•mol −1 a TA15 alloy [64], 292 kJ•mol −1 vs. 180 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy [65], 275 kJ•mol −1 vs. 148 kJ•mol −1 for a Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-1Zr alloy [66].…”
Section: Hot Deformation Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, the authors also emphasize a need for further experimental research for validation of their conclusions. Wu et al as well as Yang et al [19,20] indicated similar results in predicting the hot workability of Ti-55 high-temperature titanium alloy and for high strength automobile steel Docol 1500 Bor using an approach proposed by Prasad and Murty. Lypchanskyi et al [21] investigated the hot deformation behavior of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo alloy using processing maps based on the Malas's criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another important and specific industrial application of Ti55 alloy 46 was studied to predict the instability parameters using Prasad's instability criterion (i.e. DMM) (Supplementary Figure 27(a)) and Murty's instability criteria (i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Through Processing Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%