SAE Technical Paper Series 2018
DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-0810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Frictional Behavior of AA 6XXX with Three Lube Conditions in Sheet Metal Forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 70% of autobody had been used HSS instead of common strength steel (CSS) till 2015. However, because of the higher strength and toughness, its springback is relatively larger than CSS, resulting in low precision of shape and dimension, affecting the product quality such as appearance, assembly capability and reliability, etc [1][2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 70% of autobody had been used HSS instead of common strength steel (CSS) till 2015. However, because of the higher strength and toughness, its springback is relatively larger than CSS, resulting in low precision of shape and dimension, affecting the product quality such as appearance, assembly capability and reliability, etc [1][2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely accepted that EDT improves the forming behaviour of aluminium sheets due to better friction behaviour [26]. Several researches demonstrated the improved performance of EDT surfaces against nontextured mill finish (MF) surfaces [27][28][29][30]. On the other hand, although the patterned tool texturing has provided promising results [22,31], it is widely accepted that the work material adhesion and galling risk increases with tool roughness [32] and therefore, appropriate polishing should be applied [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interplay between the tool and the workpiece texture seems to be presumable, it has not been investigated. Previous researches generally omitted tool surface roughness data [27][28][29][30]35]. Similarly, a broad range of roughness values are reported under EDT textured sheet definition, ranging from Ra 0.2 to 1.7 [27,29,30], or quantitative data on the EDT texture was omitted [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation