2013
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on dynamic response of large and small aspect ratio isolated buildings

Abstract: SUMMARY An experimental study of a large aspect structure, 1:4 scale five‐storey steel frame, is presented. Seismic responses of the test model to the unilateral and bilateral excitations are compared. The effects of aspect ratio on the maximum acceleration, the storey drift of the superstructure, the maximum displacement and the vertical load of the isolation system are investigated. A comparison of the large aspect ratio isolated building with the small aspect ratio isolated building showed significant diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for high‐rise structures, rubber bearings will lose function in instances of severe earthquakes, specifically when the height–width ratio is over a certain value (which is affected by the site type and earthquake degree) . Moreover, the entire inclination angle of a high‐rise structure increases, and its integral anti‐overturning performance decreases, with an increase in the height–width ratio after isolation, which can easily cause overturning, endangering adjacent buildings . Therefore, the application of traditional seismic isolation technology in high‐rise structures is not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for high‐rise structures, rubber bearings will lose function in instances of severe earthquakes, specifically when the height–width ratio is over a certain value (which is affected by the site type and earthquake degree) . Moreover, the entire inclination angle of a high‐rise structure increases, and its integral anti‐overturning performance decreases, with an increase in the height–width ratio after isolation, which can easily cause overturning, endangering adjacent buildings . Therefore, the application of traditional seismic isolation technology in high‐rise structures is not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1,2 ] For long‐span or super high‐rise structures, geometric scale factors can be as large as 100 or larger. [ 3–5 ] The scale model testing relies on satisfying the similitude criteria between the model structure and the prototype structure. [ 6–8 ] When a base‐isolated structure with rubber bearings are scaled down for a shaking table test, however, it is difficult to obtain scale model rubber bearings with all of their parameters satisfying the similitude criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major objective of base isolation is the decoupling of the structures from ground motions and the subsequent reduction in the superstructure responses to protect the structure and contents. Such ideas of implementing base isolation systems have been numerously investigated over the past few decades and have proven to be reliable and cost‐effective for the seismic mitigation of structural damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%