1995
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(94)00632-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the reduction mechanism and the adsorption properties of uranium (VI)-cupferron complexes using various electrochemical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to maintain a constant pH of the electrolyte and, since we have also to consider the structure with time of the double layer at the electrode, we have chosen acetic buffer solutions, which was studied in a previous work [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to maintain a constant pH of the electrolyte and, since we have also to consider the structure with time of the double layer at the electrode, we have chosen acetic buffer solutions, which was studied in a previous work [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we will see, the time parameter playing an important role in the chemical and electrochemical reactions, we will also use new techniques which have been recently realised at the laboratory and programmed with LabView software. This is 3D Polarography [11] and 3D interracial differential capacity measurements [12] where intensity or capacity is measured as a function of potential and time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U(V) and U(V) ! U(III) [26] with the former peak appearing at more positive potentials. A recent study describing an AdSV scheme for the determination of uranium on a BiFE in the presence of cupferron indicated that in acetate buffer (pH 4.5) the U(VI) !…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the detection step, the anodic stripping was performed in the same acidic solution by scanning the potential from À 0.80 V to 0.40 V. The detection of 500 ppb (mg/L) U(VI) in 0.05 M CH 3 COONa at pH 5 using an unmodified carbon paste electrode did not yield any voltammetric response (current) for uranium, indicating that the conductive matrix was inert with respect to uranium adsorption. For the Ac-Phos SAMMS modified carbon paste electrode, the anodic peak of uranium appeared at À 0.37 V, which is likely associated with the oxidation of U(V) to U(VI) [20]. A series of experiments at different aqueous U(VI) concentrations showed that the current of this À 0.37 V peak was proportional to the U(VI) concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%