2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the preparation and spectral response of stacked graphene nanoribbon-carbon nanotube-based phototransistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5] A variety of methods have been employed to produce graphene materials, however exfoliation by mechanical (ball milling, micromechanical cleavage, sonication) 5 as well as electrochemical treatment [6][7][8] appear to be most oen used. Graphene materials can also be synthesized by other methods, such as chemical or electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide, 2,7 thermal exfoliation of graphite/graphene oxide, [9][10][11] unzipping of carbon nanotubes, 12 chemical vapour deposition, 13 or plasma assisted method. 14 Properties of graphene materials being strongly related to the method used as well as conditions applied, determine its practical application, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] A variety of methods have been employed to produce graphene materials, however exfoliation by mechanical (ball milling, micromechanical cleavage, sonication) 5 as well as electrochemical treatment [6][7][8] appear to be most oen used. Graphene materials can also be synthesized by other methods, such as chemical or electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide, 2,7 thermal exfoliation of graphite/graphene oxide, [9][10][11] unzipping of carbon nanotubes, 12 chemical vapour deposition, 13 or plasma assisted method. 14 Properties of graphene materials being strongly related to the method used as well as conditions applied, determine its practical application, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since the recombination time in graphene is few picoseconds, very few charge carriers are detected before they recombine. To circumvent this, graphene derivatives with a larger band gap, such as reduced graphene oxide (rGO), graphene quantum dots, and graphene nano ribbons, are being investigated [8,9,10,11,12] for use in photon detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optoelectronic devices based on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), namely, GNR/CNT-based cells, carbon-based phototransistors, and carbon-based photodetectors, have attracted significant interest in recent years [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Indeed, CNT/GNR-based phototransistors have gained keen focus owing to their promising features such as the unique light–CNT/GNR interaction, high photoresponsivity, fast response, high detectivity, high photosensitivity, extensive detection range, and especially, the low noise in comparison to the conventional photodiodes [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Most of these promising features are attributed to the unique characteristics that the CNTs and GNRs exhibit in terms of the physical, electrical, optical properties and are synergically correlate with their atomistic structures [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%