2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the MIB-1 Labeling Index as a Predictor of Tumor Progression in Pilocytic Astrocytomas in Children and Adolescents

Abstract: Children with PAs with an MIB-1 LI of more than 2.0 have a shortened PFS. PAs that are completely resected and are located in the cerebellum have a prolonged PFS. This initial study suggests that the MIB-1 LI identifies a more aggressive subset of PAs. Further work should focus on elucidating features of pilocytic astocytomas that will identify prospectively children at risk for progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
44
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Our method of quantification is the one most widely used and is the same as was performed in our previous study. 2 As the same counting methodology was used for the analysis of all 3 of the proliferative markers in this study, this provides a useful comparison of their benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…24 Our method of quantification is the one most widely used and is the same as was performed in our previous study. 2 As the same counting methodology was used for the analysis of all 3 of the proliferative markers in this study, this provides a useful comparison of their benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-five of these cases were included in the previously reported series of 141 consecutively diagnosed cases of PAs from our institution. 2 …”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the candidate studies, 13 articles failed to completely describe the available survival data. Finally, 51 published studies in total were included in the analysis after eliminating articles unsatisfying the selection criteria and duplicates (Jaros et al, 1992;Torp et al, 1992;Montine et al, 1994;Ellison et al, 1995;Heegaard et al, 1995;Kros et al, 1996;Coons et al, 1997;Pollack et al, 1997;Dehghani et al, 1998;McKeever et al, 1998;Ritter et al, 1998;Figarella-Branger et al, 2000;Rodriguez-Pereira et al, 2000;Ho et al, 2001;ReaveyCantwell et al, 2001;Zhong et al, 2001;Bredel et al, 2002;Pollack et al, 2002;Bowers, 2003;Chiang et al, 2003;Neder et al, 2003;Wessels et al, 2003;Zamecnik et al, 2003;Preusser et al, 2005;Uematsu et al, 2005;Kleinschmidt-DeMasters et al, 2006;Donato et al, 2007;Kanamori et al, 2008;Kuo et al, 2009;Laks et al, 2009;Li et al, 2009;Armstrong et al, 2010;Nabika et al, 2010;Watanabe et al, 2010;Yoshida et al, 2010;Habberstad et al, 2011;Margraf et al, 2011;Qiang et al, 2011;Shen et al, 2011;Zawrocki et al, 2011;…”
Section: Studies Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%