Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2012 Beijing) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/phm.2012.6228775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the long-term performance prediction methods using the spacecraft telemetry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First the statistical based models are divided into two subgroups, namely, on directly observed state processes (online) and the indirectly observed state processes (offline). In the online statistical based models there are the regression-based models, namely, coefficient regression, auto-regressive (AR) linear, auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) (Chen & Pecht 2012), non-parametric regression method (Fang et al 2012), the Wiener process (Wei et al 2013), Gamma processes (Xu & Wang 2012) and Markovian-based models (Tobon-Mejia et al 2012, Tsui et al 2014.…”
Section: Phm Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First the statistical based models are divided into two subgroups, namely, on directly observed state processes (online) and the indirectly observed state processes (offline). In the online statistical based models there are the regression-based models, namely, coefficient regression, auto-regressive (AR) linear, auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) (Chen & Pecht 2012), non-parametric regression method (Fang et al 2012), the Wiener process (Wei et al 2013), Gamma processes (Xu & Wang 2012) and Markovian-based models (Tobon-Mejia et al 2012, Tsui et al 2014.…”
Section: Phm Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the machine learning methods, Table 2, further disseminated in RUL estimations are Artificial neural network (ANN) (Lau et al 2012, Fang et al 2012, Neuro-fuzzy (NF), (Chen & Pecht 2012, Lau et al 2012, Medjaher et al 2012, Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Vasan et al 2013), Hidden Markov Model (HMM), (Lau et al 2012, Medjaher et al 2012 and Dynamic Bayesian Networks (Si et al 2012, Medjaher et al 2012.…”
Section: Phm Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attenuation factor is the comprehensive of particle radiation, ultraviolet irradiation, micrometeoroid collision, and alternating between cold and hot, and so on [10]. It can be captured through a series of simulations about SA on the ground, like particle radiation experiment or through analyzing remote sensing data from on-orbit satellite [4]. Based on the method of analyzing onorbit data to estimate the empirical model, the empirical model of SA output power [2,5,11] can be described as follows:…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction models about the attenuation of SA output power can be divided into three categories, which are the data-driven prediction method, prediction method based on model, and dynamic prediction method based on model and data. Among them, data-driven prediction methods, such as the Autoregressive Moving Average model (ARIMA), neural network, and other methods of pattern recognition, have been proved applicative to both diagnostics and prognostics in many fields [3,4], but those methods make it hard to establish a general empirical model about SA output power varying with time. Main tasks of prediction methods based on model are to analyze the influencing factors of SA output power attenuation and their effect on power and further to establish an empirical model about SA output power varying with time, through a lot of simulation and historical measurement data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao introduced a method of eliminating the outlier of telemetry data which has more reliability and practicability [3]. Losik and Fang proposed several prediction methods of telemetry parameters but did not focus on the analysis of the credibility of telemetry data [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%