Study of the baryonic<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math>decay<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>++</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup>

Lees, J. P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Ticó, J. Garra; Graugés, E.; Palano, A.; Eigen, G.; Stugu, B.; Kerth, L. T.; Kolomensky, Yu. G.; Lynch, G.; Koch, H.; Schroeder, T. Vazquez; Asgeirsson, D. J.; Hearty, C.; Mattison, T. S.; McKenna, J. A.; So, R. Y.; Khan, A.; Blinov, V.; Buzykaev, A. R.; Дружинин, В. П.; Голубев, В. Б.; Kravchenko, E. A.; Onuchin, A. P.; Serednyakov, S. I.; Skovpen, Yu. I.; Solodov, E. P.; Todyshev, K. Yu.; Yushkov, A. N.; Bondioli, M.; Kirkby, D.; Lankford, A. J.; Mandelkern, M.; Atmacan, H.; Gary, J. W.; Liu, F.; Long, O.; Vitug, G. M.; Campagnari, C.; Hong, T. M.; Kovalskyi, D.; Richman, J. D.; West, C.; Eisner, A. M.; Kroseberg, J.; Lockman, W. S.; Martínez, A. J.; Schumm, B. A.; Seiden, A.; Chao, D. S.; Cheng, C. H.; Echenard, B.; Flood, K. T.; Hitlin, D. G.; Ongmongkolkul, P.; Porter, F. C.; Rakitin, A. Y.; Andreassen, R.; Huard, Z.; Meadows, B.; Sokoloff, M. D.; Sun, L.; Bloom, P. C.; Ford, W. T.; Gaz, A.; Nauenberg, U.; Smith, J. G.; Wagner, S. R.; Ayad, R.; Toki, W. H.; Spaan, B.; Schubert, K. R.; Schwierz, R.; Bernard, D.; Verderi, M.; Clark, P. J.; Playfer, S.; Bettoni, D.; Bozzi, C.; Calabrese, R.; Cibinetto, G.; Fioravanti, E.; Garzia, I.; Luppi, E.; Munerato, M.; Negrini, M.; Piemontese, L.; Santoro, V.; Baldini-Ferroli, R.; Calcaterra, A.; Sangro, R. de; Finocchiaro, G.; Patterí, P.; Peruzzi, I. M.; Piccolo, M.; Rama, M.; Zallo, A.; Contri, R.; Guido, E.; Vetere, M. Lo; Monge, M. R.; Passaggio, S.; Patrignani, C.; Robutti, E.; Bhuyan, B.; Prasad, V.; Lee, C. L.; Morii, M.; Edwards, A. J.; Adametz, A.; Uwer, U.; Lacker, H.; Lueck, T.; Dauncey, P.; Behera, P. K.; Mallik, U.; Chen, C.; Cochran, J.; Meyer, W. T.; Prell, S.; Rubin, A. E.; Gritsan, A. V.; Guo, Z. J.; Arnaud, N.; Davier, M.; Деркач, Д.; Grosdidier, G.; Diberder, F. Le; Lutz, A. M.; Malaescu, B.; Roudeau, P.; Schune, M. H.; Stocchi, A.; Wormser, G.; Lange, D. J.; Wright, D.; Chavez, C. A.; Coleman, J. P.; Fry, J. R.; Gabathuler, E.; Hutchcroft, D.; Payne, D. J.; Touramanis, C.; Bevan, A. J.; Lodovico, F. Di; Sacco, R.; Sigamani, M.; Cowan, G.; Brown, D. N.; Davis, C. L.; Denig, A.; Fritsch, M.; Gradl, W.; Grießinger, K.; Hafner, A.; Prencipe, E.; Barlow, R. J.; Jackson, G.; Lafferty, G. D.; Behn, E.; Cenci, R.; Hamilton, B.; Jawahery, A.; Roberts, D. A.; Dallapiccola, C.; Cowan, R.; Dujmić, D.; Sciolla, G.; Cheaib, R.; Lindemann, D.; Patel, P. M.; Robertson, S. H.; Biassoni, P.; Neri, N.; Palombo, F.; Stracka, S.; Cremaldi, L.; Godang, R.; Kroeger, R.; Sonnek, P.; Summers, D. J.; Nguyen, X.; Simard, M.; Taras, P.; Nardo, G. De; Monorchio, D.; Onorato, G.; Sciacca, C.; Martinelli, M.; Raven, G.; Jessop, C.; LoSecco, J. M.; Wang, W. F.; Honscheid, K.; Kass, R.; Brau, J.; Frey, R.; Sinev, N. B.; Strom, D.; Torrence, E.; Feltresi, E.; Gagliardi, N.; Margoni, M.; Morandin, M.; Posocco, M.; Rotondo, M.; Simi, G.; Simonetto, F.; Stroili, R.; Akar, S.; Ben-Haim, E.; Bomben, M.; Bonneaud, G. R.; Briand, H.; Calderini, G.; Chauveau, J.; Hamon, O.; Leruste, Ph; Marchiori, G.; Ocariz, J.; Sitt, S.; Biasini, M.; Manoni, E.; Pacetti, S.; Rossi, A.; Angelini, C.; Batignani, G.; Bettarini, S.; Carpinelli, M.; Casarosa, G.; Cervelli, A.; Forti, F.; Giorgi, M. A.; Lusiani, A.; Oberhof, B.; Paoloni, E.; Pérez, A.; Rizzo, G.; Walsh, J.; Pegna, D. Lopes; Olsen, J.; Smith, A. J. S.; Telnov, A. V.; Anulli, F.; Faccini, R.; Ferrarotto, F.; Ferroni, F.; Gaspero, M.; Gioi, L. Li; Mazzoni, M. A.; Piredda, G.; Bünger, C.; Grünberg, O.; Hartmann, T.; Leddig, T.; Schröder, H.; Voß, C.; Waldi, R.; Adye, T.; Olaiya, E.; Wilson, F. F.; Emery, S.; Alverson, G.; Vasseur, G.; Yèche, Ch; Aston, D.; Bard, D. J.; Bartoldus, R.; Benitez, J. F.; Cartaro, C.; Convery, M. R.; Dorfan, J.; Dubois-Felsmann, G. P.; Dunwoodie, W.; Ebert, M.; Field, R. C.; Sevilla, M. Franco; Fulsom, B. G.; Gabareen, A. M.; Graham, M. T.; Grenier, P.; Hast, C.; Innes, W. R.; Kelsey, M.; Kim, P.; Kocian, M. L.; Leith, D. W. G. S.; Lewis, P.; Lindquist, B.; Luitz, S.; Lüth, V.; Lynch, H. L.; MacFarlane, D. B.; Müller, D.; Neal, H. A.; Nelson, S.; Perl, M.; Pulliam, T.; Ratcliff, B. N.; Roodman, A.; Salnikov, A. A.; Schindler, R. H.; Snyder, A.; Su, D.; Sullivan, M. K.; Va’vra, J.; Wagner, A.; Wisniewski, W. J.; Wittgen, M.; Wright, D. H.; Wulsin, H. W.; Young, C. C.; Ziegler, V.; Park, W.; Purohit, M. V.; White, R. M.; Wilson, J. R.; Randle-Conde, A.; Sekula, S. J.; Bellis, M.; Burchat, P. R.; Miyashita, T. S.; Alam, M. S.; Ernst, J.; Gorodeisky, R.; Guttman, N.; Peimer, D. R.; Soffer, A.; Lund, P.; Spanier, S.; Ritchie, J. L.; Ruland, A. M.; Schwitters, R. F.; Wray, B. C.; Izen, J. M.; Lou, X.; Bianchi, F.; Gamba, D.; Lanceri, L.; Vitale, L.; Martínez-Vidal, F.; Oyanguren, A.; Ahmed, H.; Albert, J.; Banerjee, S.; Bernlochner, F. U.; Choi, H. H. F.; King, G. J.; Kowalewski, R.; Lewczuk, M. J.; Nugent, I. M.; Roney, J. M.; Sobie, R. J.; Tasneem, N.; Gershon, T.; Harrison, P. F.; Latham, T.; Puccio, E. M. T.; Band, H. R.; Dasu, S.; Pan, Y.; Prepost, R.; Wu, S. L.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.091102

Cited by 90 publications

(157 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

142

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the Particle Data Group (PDG) table [2] there are two vector resonances with a mass near 2.2 GeV/c 2 : φ(2170) and ρ(2150). The first is observed in three reactions: e + e − → φ(2170) [3,4], J/ψ → ηφ(2170) [5,6], and e + e − → ηφ(2170) [7], but only in the decay mode φ(2170) → φ(1020)f 0 (980). As shown in Ref.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resonances in e+e− annihilation near 2.2 GeV

Lees¹,

Poireau²,

Tisserand³

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using the initial-state radiation method, the e + e − → KSKL cross section from 1.98 to 2.54 GeV is measured in a data sample of 469 fb −1 collected with the BABAR detector. The results are used in conjunction with previous BABAR results for the e + e − → K + K − , e + e − → π + π − , e + e − → π + π − η, and e + e − → ωππ cross sections to investigate the nature of the resonance structure recently observed by the BESIII experiment in the e + e − → K + K − cross section.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resonances in e+e− annihilation near 2.2 GeV

Lees¹,

Poireau²,

Tisserand³

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is very tempting to look at it as a D Ã0 p molecular state. Furthermore, several unexplained structures in Σ þþ c π þ π − invariant mass spectrum at 3.2 GeV=c 2 , 3.8 GeV=c 2 and 4.2 GeV=c 2 have been reported by the BABAR Collaboration [9,10], the 3.2 GeV=c 2 [named X c ð3250Þ] being attributed to a hadronic molecule [11]. Finally, in Ref.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Hadronic molecules in the open charm and open bottom baryon spectrum

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a constituent quark model, we study possible molecular structures in the nonstrange open-charm and open-bottom spectrum. D ðÃÞ N,B ðÃÞ N, D ðÃÞ Δ, andB ðÃÞ Δ configurations are considered. We found molecular structures in all these channels. In particular, we describe the Λ c ð2940Þ as a D Ã N molecule with J P ¼ 3 2 − , whereas D ðÃÞ Δ structures may be an option for the recently discovered X c ð3250Þ and X c ð3212Þ resonances.

show abstract

“…The PDG branching ratio [1] of the decays − → − ( exp = 1.55(8) × 10 −4 ) 14 and − → − ( exp = 6.96(10) × 10 −3 ) are also added as external restrictions to the fit. The decay − → − ′ has not been detected yet, there is only an upper limit at the 90% confidence level placed by BaBar [69] and we therefore have decided to not include it in our analysis. Hence, the 2 function to be minimized in this case is chosen to be…”

Section: New Physics Bounds From |δ | = 1 Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TWe perform a global analysis of exclusive hadronic tau decays into one and two mesons using the lowenergy limit of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory up to dimension six, assuming left-handed neutrinos. A controlled theoretical input on the Standard Model hadronic form factors, based on chiral symmetry, dispersion relations, data and asymptotic QCD properties, has allowed us to set bounds on the New Physics effective couplings using the present experimental data. Our results highlight the importance of semileptonic decays in complementing the traditional low-energy probes, such nuclear decays or semileptonic pion and kaon decays, and the high-energy measurements at LHC scales. This makes yet another reason for considering hadronic tau decays as golden modes at Belle-II.

show abstract

Study of the baryonicBdecayB−→Σc++p¯π−

Cited by 90 publications

References 8 publications

Resonances in e+e− annihilation near 2.2 GeV

Resonances in e+e− annihilation near 2.2 GeV

Hadronic molecules in the open charm and open bottom baryon spectrum

Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About