2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions

Abstract: A B S T R A C TWe perform a global analysis of exclusive hadronic tau decays into one and two mesons using the lowenergy limit of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory up to dimension six, assuming left-handed neutrinos. A controlled theoretical input on the Standard Model hadronic form factors, based on chiral symmetry, dispersion relations, data and asymptotic QCD properties, has allowed us to set bounds on the New Physics effective couplings using the present experimental data. Our results highlight the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(55). In fact, in our recent global fit to one-and two-meson tau decays [56], the significance of a nonvanishingε S is reduced to ∼3σ, with small correlations in this case.…”
Section: A Limits Onε S Andε Tmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(55). In fact, in our recent global fit to one-and two-meson tau decays [56], the significance of a nonvanishingε S is reduced to ∼3σ, with small correlations in this case.…”
Section: A Limits Onε S Andε Tmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Such analysis has very recently been carried out in Ref. [56], where more competitive bounds have been obtained as a result of a global analysis to exclusive hadronic tau decays.…”
Section: A Limits Onε S Andε Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are comparable with the ratios for M X /g X presented in [20] and are of the same order than in the charged-current sector (see, for example, refs. [86] and [87]). 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%