Study of Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for High Potential Seismic Hazard According to Indonesian Standard

Wahyuni, Endah; Aji, Pujo; Budi, Firman

doi:10.12962/j23546026.y2017i2.2273

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The research entitled "Study of Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for High Potential Seismic Hazard According to Indonesian Standard" [8] to find out how important RVS from FEMA 154 can be applied in Indonesia with a case study of ATK Yogyakarta Building. The RVS FEMA 154 method with SNI 1726 can be said to have met so that RVS can be used in Indonesia by adjusting the earthquake acceleration map so that there are no errors in determining the earthquake zone.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of seismic vulnerability assessment building using rapid visual screening method: case study at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Islamic State Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri University

Pramesti

Widyaningrum

Hermanto

2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia is one of the nations that is more prone to earthquakes due to its location at the intersection of the Indo-Australian, Eurasian, and Pacific plates. This study aims to find out the vulnerability and final score of the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Islamic State Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri University used the RVS method based on FEMA P-154, where this method is one of the earliest methods used to evaluate the vulnerability of a building, and has a final value limit of 2. If the final score is more than 2, then the building under review has a low vulnerability to earthquakes and vice versa. This building is one of the mid-rise buildings in Purwokerto which was established in 2019. Based on RVS analysis, the final score was 3.6 for the category of concrete moment-resisting frames (C1) and 1.4 for the category of concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls (C3). Thus, the results showed this 6-story building has a vulnerability to earthquakes with a high category of a high probability of damage to level 3 and a very high probability of level 2 damage.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of seismic vulnerability assessment building using rapid visual screening method: case study at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Islamic State Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri University

Pramesti

Widyaningrum

Hermanto

2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The weight and score of each parameter are symbolized as w i and SCORE i , respectively. The earthquake safety of the structures in Indonesia was assessed by Wahyuni et al (2017) [194] using FEMA P-154 [8], which is a widely used RVS approach. Pujianto et al (2019) [195] conducted a rapid postearthquake visual assessment of school buildings in Lombok, Indonesia, using the Indonesian standard [196].…”

Section: Lowmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review

Bektaş

Kegyes-Brassai

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developments in the field of earthquake engineering over the past few decades have contributed to the development of new methods for evaluating the risk levels in buildings. These research methods are rapid visual screening (RVS), seismic risk indexes, and vulnerability assessments, which have been developed to assess the levels of damage in a building or its structural components. RVS methods have been proposed for the rapid pre- and/or post-earthquake screening of existing large building stock in earthquake-prone areas on the basis of sidewalk surveys. The site seismicity, the soil type, the building type, and the corresponding building characteristic features are to be separately examined, and the vulnerability level of each building can be identified by employing the RVS methods. This study describes, evaluates, and compares the findings of previous investigations that utilized conventional RVS methods within a framework. It also suggests the methods to be used for specific goals and proposes prospective enhancement strategies. Furthermore, the article discusses the time-consuming RVS methods (such as FEMA 154, which requires from 15 to 30 min, while NRCC requires one hour), and provides an overview of the application areas of the methods (pre-earthquake: FEMA 154, NRCC, NZEE, etc.; postearthquake: GNDT, EMS, etc.). This review of the traditional RVS methods offers a comprehensive guide and reference for field practitioners (e.g., engineers, architects), and recommends enhancement techniques (e.g., machine learning, fuzzy logic) for researchers to be used in future improvements.

show abstract

“…Kemudian, untuk mengisi formular RVS yang disediakan oleh FEMA 154, kajian ini juga merujuk kepada SNI 1726-2019 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk menentukan nilai percepatan gempa berdasarkan peta gempa yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam penerapan RVS untuk di Indonesia, perlu diperhatikan penggunaan peta sesimik SNI 1726 agar tidak terjadi kesalahan dalam menentukan zona gempa [6].…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Kajian Potensi Ancaman Seismik pada Gedung Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Sleman Menggunakan Metode Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) FEMA-154

Ja'far

2022

aptek

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Asesmen Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) FEMA 154 merupakan sebuah metode untuk melakukan kajian cepat pada sebuah bangunan. Kajian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengukur potensi ancaman seismik sebuah gedung yang terletak di wilayah tertentu. Dalam penelitian ini, metode asesmen RVS diimplementasikan pada Gedung Dinas Kabupaten Sleman. Gedung ini merupakan gedung layanan publik yang terletak di wilayah dengan tingkat seismisitas yang cenderung tinggi. Dalam melakukan RVS, ada beberapa tahapan yang harus dilakukan yakni penentuan form asesmen, pengisian form asesmen, penilaian (scoring) hasil asesmen, dan interpretasi hasil asesmen. Setelah dilakukan asesmen RVS terhadap Gedung Dinas Pendidikan Sleman, skor akhir yang didapatkan adalah 2.3. Skor ini kemudian diolah dengan menggunakan persamaan probabilitas. Hasilnya, bangunan ini memiliki nilai probabilitas sebesar 0.5%. Artinya, secara umum bangunan ini dapat dikatakan memiliki probabilitas yang rendah untuk mengalami keruntuhan akibat gempa

show abstract

Study of Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for High Potential Seismic Hazard According to Indonesian Standard

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluation of seismic vulnerability assessment building using rapid visual screening method: case study at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Islamic State Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri University

Evaluation of seismic vulnerability assessment building using rapid visual screening method: case study at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business of Islamic State Prof. KH. Saifuddin Zuhri University

Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review

Kajian Potensi Ancaman Seismik pada Gedung Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Sleman Menggunakan Metode Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) FEMA-154

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About