2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1498889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of oxygen vacancies in SrTiO3 by positron annihilation

Abstract: Suppression of oxygen diffusion by thin Al 2 O 3 films grown on Sr Ti O 3 studied using a monoenergetic positron beam J. Appl. Phys. 97, 033508 (2005); 10.1063/1.1836010 Defects in CeO 2 / SrTiO 3 fabricated by automatic feeding epitaxy probed using positron annihilation J. Appl. Phys. 94, 5193 (2003); 10.1063/1.1606112Vacancy-type defects in BaTiO 3 / SrTiO 3 structures probed by monoenergetic positron beams Oxygen vacancies introduced by homoepitaxial growth of thin films on strontium titanate (SrTiO 3 ) sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 For the 760-BFO/SRO/STO heterostructure ͓Fig. 2͑d͔͒, the S BFO at E ϳ 12 keV is lower than the S BFO at E ϳ 2.7 keV in region B, and the S STO is lower than the other two S STO For BFO/SRO/STO, their rougher surface should be due to their differences from BFO/SRO/DSO, i.e., the stronger compressive strain and/or the STO absorbing V O s. As mentioned before, with the P O 2 decreasing from 760 to 0.001 Torr, BFO surface creates a large amount of V O to satisfy the increased S STO in region D. 9,10 Simultaneously, a large amount of oxygen atoms in STO substrate diffused to BFO surface and contribute more O 2 . These V O s diffusion, together with the V O s-induced crystal expansion, should be the main reason of the BFO surface worsening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18 For the 760-BFO/SRO/STO heterostructure ͓Fig. 2͑d͔͒, the S BFO at E ϳ 12 keV is lower than the S BFO at E ϳ 2.7 keV in region B, and the S STO is lower than the other two S STO For BFO/SRO/STO, their rougher surface should be due to their differences from BFO/SRO/DSO, i.e., the stronger compressive strain and/or the STO absorbing V O s. As mentioned before, with the P O 2 decreasing from 760 to 0.001 Torr, BFO surface creates a large amount of V O to satisfy the increased S STO in region D. 9,10 Simultaneously, a large amount of oxygen atoms in STO substrate diffused to BFO surface and contribute more O 2 . These V O s diffusion, together with the V O s-induced crystal expansion, should be the main reason of the BFO surface worsening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a monoenergetic positron beam, the parameter ͑S͒ of positron annihilation can be measured as a function of the incident positron energy ͑E, keV͒, where S is defined as S = N s / N T , and N T and N s are the numbers of annihilation events occurring in the range of 503.8 keVՅ E ␥ Յ 518.2 keV or 510.24 keVՅ E ␥ Յ 511.76 keV, respectively. [8][9][10][11][12] Compared with the S of vacancy-free material, the S of a material may increase when open volume and/or density of vacancy-type defects increase. [8][9][10][11][12] In this article, we have found that the partial pressure of oxygen ͑P O 2 ͒ during cooling after growth, strain-state, and substrate material are very important in manipulating the density, diffusion, and distribution of V O s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each spectrum was collected with a total count of 2×10 6 . The positron source 22 Na on a kapton foil backing was sandwiched between two pellet samples and was placed between the two detectors of the spectrometer. The components of the positron annihilation in the source and the Kapton films were determined to be 385 ps with an intensity of 17.4% and 1100 ps with an intensity of 1.0%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,19,20 Recently, PALS has been widely applied in the fields of solid materials, especially in condensed substances, materials physics, and also in physics, chemistry, materials science and biology, etc. 19,21,22 In this research, in addition to PALS and HRTEM, photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL) and UV Raman spectroscopy are also used to systematically study the P25 photocatalytic process under the Uv-visible light irradiation. It expects to reveal the defects changes within TiO 2 nanoparticles from PALS by comparing the different samples involving pristine, adsorption, degradation and recovery samples, and deeply understand the photocatalytic process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%