2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of outdoor ozone penetration into buildings through ventilation and infiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, indoor concentrations of fine particulate matter do not correlate closely with outdoor concentrations [5]. Elevated concentrations of ozone (O 3 ) in the outdoor air do not typically penetrate indoor environments, but can enter dwellings more effectively by mechanical and open windows [6].…”
Section: Trends In Sustainable Air Quality Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, indoor concentrations of fine particulate matter do not correlate closely with outdoor concentrations [5]. Elevated concentrations of ozone (O 3 ) in the outdoor air do not typically penetrate indoor environments, but can enter dwellings more effectively by mechanical and open windows [6].…”
Section: Trends In Sustainable Air Quality Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, I/O ratios for PM 2.5 were found to be higher at the trafficked site than the residential site [153]. A comparative study by Lai et al [154] found that the I/O ratio of ozone for using natural ventilation is significantly higher than for using mechanical ventilation with filtrations. Moreover, Rivas et al [155] reported that the indoor levels of traffic sourced pollutants, such as NO 2 , equivalent black carbon (EBC), ultrafine particles (UFP) and stibium (Sb), are very similar to those recorded outdoors.…”
Section: Evidences Of Outdoor Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related penetration research is usually carried out in two ways: field measurement and laboratory simulation. Field experiments are always conducted in real buildings such as school classrooms, dormitories, and offices (Chao et al, 2003;Chatoutsidou et al, 2015;Cong et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2018;Hussein, 2017;Lai et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Chen and Zhao, 2017), while a test chamber or a building brick is usually used as the object to simulate the indoor or outdoor environment in laboratory simulations (Chen and Zhao, 2017;Lai and Nazaroff, 2000;Li et al, 2017;Liu and Nazaroff, 2001;Lv et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2020). The difference between laboratory simulation and field testing is a greater control of the conditions in a laboratory setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%