Abstract:Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the factor VIII gene (F8), which encodes factor VIII (FVIII) protein, a plasma glycoprotein, that plays an important role in the blood coagulation cascade. In the present study, our aim was to identify F8 gene mutations in HA patients from Jordan. One hundred and seventy-five HA patients from 42 unrelated families were included in this study. Among these patients, 117 (67%) had severe HA, 13 (7%) had moderate HA and 45 (26%) h… Show more
“…We detected 25 different mutations as causative for sHA, with the F8 intron 22 inversion as the most common mutation (41%), which is consistent with other reports that show that this inversion affects approximately 40–50% of the cases [7,12,21–25]. The intron 1 inversion frequency varies between populations, ranging from 0% to 5% in patients with sHA [5,12,22,23,25–27]. In our study, we did not detect this mutation, which is in agreement with some of the above studies [23,26,27].…”
Haemophilia A is caused by mutations in the gene encoding coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In severe Haemophilia A (sHA), two inversions are responsible for approximately 50% of the genetic alterations (intron 22 and intron 1 inversions). The other mutations are extremely diverse and each affected family generally has its own mutation. Our aim was to detect the genetic alterations present in the FVIII gene (F8) in 54 unrelated male patients with sHA in Venezuela. We initially detected the presence of the intron 22 inversion by performing inverse PCR, and the negative patients for this inversion were analysed for the intron 1 inversion by PCR. Patients negative for both inversions were analysed using Conformation Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis for mutations in all exons, promoter region and 3¢-UTR. sHA causative mutations were identified in 49 patients. Intron-22 and -1 inversions were detected in 41% and 0% of patients respectively. Besides these two mutations, 25 different mutations were identified, including nine nonsense, four small deletions, two small insertions, four missense, three splicing mutations and three large deletions. Seven novel mutations were identified, including two nonsense mutations, two small deletions, one small insertion, one missense mutation and one splicing mutation. Thirty one percent of the patients with identified mutations developed inhibitors against exogenous FVIII. This is the first report of F8 mutations in patients with sHA in Venezuela; the data from this study suggests that the spectrum of gene defects found in these patients is as heterogeneous as reported previously for other populations.
“…We detected 25 different mutations as causative for sHA, with the F8 intron 22 inversion as the most common mutation (41%), which is consistent with other reports that show that this inversion affects approximately 40–50% of the cases [7,12,21–25]. The intron 1 inversion frequency varies between populations, ranging from 0% to 5% in patients with sHA [5,12,22,23,25–27]. In our study, we did not detect this mutation, which is in agreement with some of the above studies [23,26,27].…”
Haemophilia A is caused by mutations in the gene encoding coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In severe Haemophilia A (sHA), two inversions are responsible for approximately 50% of the genetic alterations (intron 22 and intron 1 inversions). The other mutations are extremely diverse and each affected family generally has its own mutation. Our aim was to detect the genetic alterations present in the FVIII gene (F8) in 54 unrelated male patients with sHA in Venezuela. We initially detected the presence of the intron 22 inversion by performing inverse PCR, and the negative patients for this inversion were analysed for the intron 1 inversion by PCR. Patients negative for both inversions were analysed using Conformation Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis for mutations in all exons, promoter region and 3¢-UTR. sHA causative mutations were identified in 49 patients. Intron-22 and -1 inversions were detected in 41% and 0% of patients respectively. Besides these two mutations, 25 different mutations were identified, including nine nonsense, four small deletions, two small insertions, four missense, three splicing mutations and three large deletions. Seven novel mutations were identified, including two nonsense mutations, two small deletions, one small insertion, one missense mutation and one splicing mutation. Thirty one percent of the patients with identified mutations developed inhibitors against exogenous FVIII. This is the first report of F8 mutations in patients with sHA in Venezuela; the data from this study suggests that the spectrum of gene defects found in these patients is as heterogeneous as reported previously for other populations.
“…The aim of this study was to investigate mutations in the factor-VIII gene in Saudi Arabian population. There are few previous reports about hemophilia A screening in the Middle Eastern population, specifically in Saudi Arabian Population by Owaidah, et al in Lebanese population by Khayat, et al in Tunisian population by Elmahmoudi, et al [50] and in Jordanian population by Awidi, et al [31]. In the present study mutational screenings of factor VIII gene sequencing analysis, and intronic rearrangements such as, inv-1 and inv-22 analysis were performed in the hemophilia A patients of Saudi Arabian population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies are available in literature describing the mutations in factor VIII gene, from many ethnic groups and different populations [16,17,25,29,30]. Recently, some reports were published from Middle Eastern countries also describing factor VIII gene mutations [31][32][33][34]. However, the spectrum and nature of common mutations causing hemophilia A in Arab population specifically in Saudi Arabs is not clear.…”
“…28,23 Pada ras Asia, prevalensnya jauh lebih rendah yaitu 1,4−10,4%. [29][30][31][32] Pada penelitian ini, prevalens inhibitor faktor VIII adalah 7,3% dan 87,5% diantaranya ditemukan pada hemofilia A berat. Selain faktor ras, pola terapi on demand, dosis terapi yang relatif rendah dan konsentrat faktor VIII yang berasal dari plasma (plasma derived clotting factor concentrate) merupakan faktor-faktor yang dapat berkontribusi terhadap rendahnya prevalens inhibitor pada subjek penelitian kami.…”
Latar belakang. Gejala perdarahan pada hemofilia A bergantung pada kadar faktor VIII, namun pada kadar faktor koagulasi yang sama dapat terjadi perbedaan karakteristik dan luaran klinis. Tujuan. Mengidentifikasi pola perdarahan, terapi dan komplikasi pada anak hemofilia A. Metode. Penelitian kohort retrospektif pada anak ≤18 tahun di RSCM. Data diambil dari rekam medis (Januari 2014 – Juni 2016) meliputi data usia awitan perdarahan sendi, usia saat diagnosis, kekerapan perdarahan, lokasi perdarahan, penggunaan faktor VIII, dan komplikasi yang dialami. Hasil. Terdapat 109 anak lelaki terdiri dari 2,8% hemofilia A ringan, 27,5% hemofilia A sedang, dan 69,7% hemofilia A berat. Perdarahan tersering ditemukan pada sendi (60,6%) terutama pada lutut (37,2%). Dibandingkan hemofilia A ringan dan sedang, anak hemofilia A berat menunjukkan usia awitan perdarahan sendi lebih dini (median 12,5 (4-120) bulan), kekerapan perdarahan sendi lebih sering (median 8 (1-44) kali/tahun), dan menggunakan konsentrat faktor VIII lebih banyak (median 712 (131-1913) IU/kg/tahun). Komplikasi terbanyak adalah artropati dan sinovitis kronik (46,8%) serta inhibitor faktor VIII (7,3%). Terdapat 9 dari 71 (12,6)% subjek hemofilia A berat menunjukkan karakteristik klinis lebih ringan. Kesimpulan. Pola perdarahan pada anak hemofilia A sesuai kadar faktor VIII, tetapi pada hemofilia A berat terdapat variabilitas subjek dengan gejala klinis lebih ringan.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.