2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4255-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of $$\Lambda _b\rightarrow \Lambda (\phi ,\eta ^{(\prime )})$$ Λ b → Λ ( ϕ , η ( ′ ) ) and $$\Lambda _b\rightarrow \Lambda K^+K^-$$ Λ b → Λ K + K - decays

Abstract: We study the charmless two-body b → (φ, η ( ) ) and three-body b → K + K − decays. We obtain B( b → φ) = (3.53 ± 0.24) × 10 −6 to agree with the recent LHCb measurement. However, we find that B( b → η ), given by the previous study.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BðΛ 0 b → ΛηÞ ¼ 2.95 × 10 −6 , BðΛ 0 b → Λη 0 Þ ¼ 3.24 × 10 −6 , and R Λ ηη 0 ¼ 0.91, for form factors calculated in a pole model. Another study also uses the generalized factorization approach [8], and the results are: BðΛ 0 b → ΛηÞ ¼ ð1.47 AE 0.35Þ × 10 −6 , BðΛ 0 b → Λη 0 Þ ¼ ð1.83 AE 0.58Þ × 10 −6 , and R Λ ηη 0 ¼ 0.80 AE 0.32. One can see a large difference in predictions between different approaches.…”
Section: Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…BðΛ 0 b → ΛηÞ ¼ 2.95 × 10 −6 , BðΛ 0 b → Λη 0 Þ ¼ 3.24 × 10 −6 , and R Λ ηη 0 ¼ 0.91, for form factors calculated in a pole model. Another study also uses the generalized factorization approach [8], and the results are: BðΛ 0 b → ΛηÞ ¼ ð1.47 AE 0.35Þ × 10 −6 , BðΛ 0 b → Λη 0 Þ ¼ ð1.83 AE 0.58Þ × 10 −6 , and R Λ ηη 0 ¼ 0.80 AE 0.32. One can see a large difference in predictions between different approaches.…”
Section: Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason leads to the difference may be: (1) Anomaly contribution. In [8], one effect of anomaly term is introduced in the ηðη 0 Þ decay constants. (2) a 6 and a 8 contributions.…”
Section: Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the two-body B meson decays, this empirical estimation has been demonstrated to agree with the sub-leading calculations like the QCD factorization [23][24][25], where the similar a 1 is modified by the detailed calculation for the non-factorizable effects but with the number to fall into the allowed range with N eff c from 2 to ∞ in the generalized version of the factorization [20]. While the theory depends on the data to test its validity, in the b decays the generalized factorization has been used to explain the data well [19,[26][27][28][29]. However, it is clear that the sub-leading calculations for the non-factorizable effects have not been well developed in b → c M (c) yet.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%