2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of hydration properties of wheat bran as a function of particle size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Noort et al (2010). This may contribute to the differences between the WHCs of coarse and fine bran samples (Zhang and Moore 1997;Jacobs et al 2015). WB-200 had the lowest WHC (2.8 g of water/g of bran).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar results were reported by Noort et al (2010). This may contribute to the differences between the WHCs of coarse and fine bran samples (Zhang and Moore 1997;Jacobs et al 2015). WB-200 had the lowest WHC (2.8 g of water/g of bran).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using different sizes of wheat bran particles obtained by grinding, Auffret et al (1994), Jacobs et al (2015), and Zhang and Moore (1999) observed a decline in water retention capacity with the decreasing particle diameter. Otherwise, Roth et al (2016) using dried distiller's grains as the fibre supplement of particle size fractions, <750, <500, and <250 μm, showed no significant influence of the fractions on water absorption that was determined using dough LAB kneader.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Hydration And Particle Size Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, the fibre hydration kinetics may have been influenced by other physical and chemical parameters, e.g. the specific surface and texture, in particular porosity (Jacobs et al 2015), and the chemical composition of the fibre supplements.…”
Section: Rheological Characteristics Of Fibre Supplementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be taken into account that the by-products with higher DF-levels also had a higher MPS. Indeed, also the microporous structure and imperfect packing of bran particles are said to be important parameters for their capacity to retain water in the tests used (Jacobs, Hemdane, Dornez, Delcour, & Courtin, 2015;Mongeau & Brassard, 1982). Also damaged starch can absorb more water than for instance granular starch (Berton, Scher, Villieras, & Hardy, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%