2015
DOI: 10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00001.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of genetic polymorphism of various chicken breeds using microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this investigation assessed the impact of long-term selection on egg production associated microsatellite profiles. The present observation of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci out of ten, with an average allele number per locus of 3.000 ± 1.4142 was more than in the report by ARYA (2012), who observed nine polymorphic loci out of 47 microsatellite loci using 3.4% MetaPhor Agarose in a high and low egg production sub-population of White leghorn chicken, but comparable to that of DESHMUKH et al, (2015), who reported 17 polymorphic loci out of 25 microsatellite loci in different chicken breeds using 3.4% MetaPhor Agarose. The allele number and average number of alleles per locus in the present study were lower than earlier reports in various native and exotic chicken breeds (PANDEY et al, 2002;VIJH and TANTIA, 2004;PANDEY et al, 2005;BAO et al, 2008;CHATTERJEE et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…However, this investigation assessed the impact of long-term selection on egg production associated microsatellite profiles. The present observation of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci out of ten, with an average allele number per locus of 3.000 ± 1.4142 was more than in the report by ARYA (2012), who observed nine polymorphic loci out of 47 microsatellite loci using 3.4% MetaPhor Agarose in a high and low egg production sub-population of White leghorn chicken, but comparable to that of DESHMUKH et al, (2015), who reported 17 polymorphic loci out of 25 microsatellite loci in different chicken breeds using 3.4% MetaPhor Agarose. The allele number and average number of alleles per locus in the present study were lower than earlier reports in various native and exotic chicken breeds (PANDEY et al, 2002;VIJH and TANTIA, 2004;PANDEY et al, 2005;BAO et al, 2008;CHATTERJEE et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Das et al (2015a) screened 24 MS loci including ADL0158, ADL0176 and MCW0044 by 6% urea-PAGE and documented quite similar alleles at MCW0044 but variable alleles at ADL0158 and ADL0176 in 24 number of RIR S population. Deshmukh et al (2015) 2010) evaluated five loci viz., ADL0023, ADL0158, ADL0176, MCW0044 and MCW0110, which were also explored in present investigation along with other microsatellite in two indigenous native breed, Kadaknath and Aseel, and three different chicken lines, viz. Vanaraja male line, Vanaraja female line and Gramapriya female line using 8% nondenaturing PAGE and reported quite comparable alleles at ADL0176, MCW0044 and MCW0110 but variable alleles at ADL0023 and ADL0158.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 alleles at MCW0044, 4 alleles at ADL0158 and 3 alleles at ADL0176 in RIR S chicken. However, Deshmukh et al (2015) reported 2 to 3 alleles at polymorphic locus and average number of alleles per locus across the breeds was 2.41 in Hill fowl, Rhode Island Red, Kadaknath, White Cornish and White Leghorn, and also reported varied numbers of observed alleles, i.e. 3 alleles at ADL0176, 1 allele at ADL0273, 2 alleles at Chatterjee et al (2010) reported the observed numbers of alleles in two indigenous native breed (Kadaknath and Aseel) as well as three different chicken lines (Vanaraja male and female line and Gramapriya female line) for loci ADL0023, ADL0158, ADL0176, MCW0044 and MCW0110 which were close to those observed in the present investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genetic diversity data were analyzed with POPGENE32 (Guo and Elston, 1999;Kavitha et al 2015;Jiménez-Mena et al 2016). Polymorphism information content value (PIC) for all the loci were estimated according to Deshmukh et al (2015) and Bai et al (2016b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%