1999
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-999-0135-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of electromagnetic separation of nometallic inclusions from aluminum melt

Abstract: Several methods using the concept of electromagnetic separation of nonmetallic inclusions from an aluminum melt were analytically studied and compared in this article. The migration rate of inclusion particles for each method by exerting different types of electromagnetic field, viz. DC electric field with steady magnetic field, AC magnetic field, and AC electric field, was calculated and compared with the gravity settling velocity. Effects of various operating parameters, such as the imposing time of electrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods of the imposition of the electromagnetic force are classified into the following six types: (a) simultaneous imposition of direct current and stationary magnetic field, [1][2][3] (b) imposition of alternating current, 4) (c) imposition of alternating magnetic field, [5][6][7][8] (d) imposition of traveling magnetic field, 9) (e) simultaneous imposition of alternating current and alternating magnetic field, 10,11) (f) imposition of stationary magnetic field. 12) In addition to these studies, Shu et al 13) and Makarov et al 14) recently investigated the availability of the electromagnetic separation theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of the imposition of the electromagnetic force are classified into the following six types: (a) simultaneous imposition of direct current and stationary magnetic field, [1][2][3] (b) imposition of alternating current, 4) (c) imposition of alternating magnetic field, [5][6][7][8] (d) imposition of traveling magnetic field, 9) (e) simultaneous imposition of alternating current and alternating magnetic field, 10,11) (f) imposition of stationary magnetic field. 12) In addition to these studies, Shu et al 13) and Makarov et al 14) recently investigated the availability of the electromagnetic separation theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) Experimental results 11) show that the electromagnetic separation is effective even in the case with strong electromagnetic stirring for this scheme. Although a stationary liquid model and a complete mixing model 9) were presented to calculate the separation efficiency of inclusions, effects of the induced flow on the particle behavior and the overall separation efficiency are yet to be investigated in such separators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[57] Larger particle size, longer treatment time, larger effective magnetic flux density and smaller cross section area of the channel favor the removal of inclusions from the molten silicon.…”
Section: Fig52mentioning
confidence: 99%