2022
DOI: 10.52547/rbmb.11.1.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Antibacterial Chemical Substances and Molecular Investigation among Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT)- Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates

Abstract: Background: Escherichia coli (E. coli) remains one of the leading agents of urinary tract infection (UTIs), it has become resistant to many drugs. Current work aimed to evaluate some chemical substances as antibacterial agents and molecular study of virulence factors associated with UTIs. Methods: This work involved 133 urine specimens obtained from females' patients suffering from UTIs, Methods of well diffusion and disk diffusion were achieved to assay the effect of some chemical substances and antibiogram p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study done by Khurshid et al (18) found that frequency of sul-1 and sul-2 genes among 131 isolates of SXT-resistant A. baumannii were 10.7% and 72.5% respectively, while 16% of isolates have been both sul-1 and sul-2. However, this result were closer to a local study done by Muhammed et al (25) in Al-Najaf City, they observed high spreading of sul-1 and sul-2 but sul-3 was not detected among SXT-resistant E. coli isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A study done by Khurshid et al (18) found that frequency of sul-1 and sul-2 genes among 131 isolates of SXT-resistant A. baumannii were 10.7% and 72.5% respectively, while 16% of isolates have been both sul-1 and sul-2. However, this result were closer to a local study done by Muhammed et al (25) in Al-Najaf City, they observed high spreading of sul-1 and sul-2 but sul-3 was not detected among SXT-resistant E. coli isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Also, a previous report indicated that E. coli isolates demonstrated notable resistance to LEV and DO, with resistance rates of 18% and 37% respectively (Aly, Essam & Amin 2012). Moreover, in previous study, the E. coli isolates showed 85.7% resistance against PRL and 100% resistance against SXT (Ali et al 2022). Based on the current findings, it is possible to attribute the high susceptibility rates of AK and MRP to the accurate selection of these antibiotics for therapeutic purposes, as this approach ensures the preservation of the antibiotics' efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, the diameter of its inhibition zone was greater for S. aureus than for E. coli. Genes of E. coli were associated with main virulence factors such as adhesins, toxins with increased pathogenicity and caused human infection [14]. The resistance level of gram-negative bacteria was higher than its grampositive counterpart [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%