“…It appears therefore from the results of these experiments that in plants under quite ordinary conditions, changes of stomatal aperture and transpiration do not necessarily run parallel. Darwin (9) claims a much closer correlation between these two functions than has been obtained in the present work, but Darwin made no attempt to control his experimental conditions, 1 and most of his transpiration measurements were based upon readings of absorption by the plant from a potometer, uncontrolled by weighing; although, as has been frequently shown, absorption is not by any means necessarily the same as transpiration. The differences between the two can be large enough to influence the transpiration rate without causing any obvious change in the turgor of the leaf, as has been demonstrated by many of the above experiments, so that the fact that a plant is not flaccid is no assurance that its rate of absorption is equal to its rate of transpiration.…”