1914
DOI: 10.2307/2255514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Transpiring Power of Plants as Indicated by the Method of Standardized Hygrometric Paper

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1916
1916
1956
1956

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears therefore from the results of these experiments that in plants under quite ordinary conditions, changes of stomatal aperture and transpiration do not necessarily run parallel. Darwin (9) claims a much closer correlation between these two functions than has been obtained in the present work, but Darwin made no attempt to control his experimental conditions, 1 and most of his transpiration measurements were based upon readings of absorption by the plant from a potometer, uncontrolled by weighing; although, as has been frequently shown, absorption is not by any means necessarily the same as transpiration. The differences between the two can be large enough to influence the transpiration rate without causing any obvious change in the turgor of the leaf, as has been demonstrated by many of the above experiments, so that the fact that a plant is not flaccid is no assurance that its rate of absorption is equal to its rate of transpiration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It appears therefore from the results of these experiments that in plants under quite ordinary conditions, changes of stomatal aperture and transpiration do not necessarily run parallel. Darwin (9) claims a much closer correlation between these two functions than has been obtained in the present work, but Darwin made no attempt to control his experimental conditions, 1 and most of his transpiration measurements were based upon readings of absorption by the plant from a potometer, uncontrolled by weighing; although, as has been frequently shown, absorption is not by any means necessarily the same as transpiration. The differences between the two can be large enough to influence the transpiration rate without causing any obvious change in the turgor of the leaf, as has been demonstrated by many of the above experiments, so that the fact that a plant is not flaccid is no assurance that its rate of absorption is equal to its rate of transpiration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The existence of this inhibiting factor has been demonstrated in various plants by Shreve (21) and Giddings (12) in a similar manner, and also by Bakke (1), Trelease and Livingston (22), and Bakke and Livingston (2), using the hygrometric paper method. In addition to this ' early maximum' of transpiring power, a secondary maximum has also been found by Bakke (1), Shreve (21), and by Bakke and Livingston (2) in various plants.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…This method with the addition of more recent improvements has been frequently used (1,2,3,22,30), and appears to be very satisfactory.…”
Section: R Esearches On Transpiration In Recent Years Have Resultedmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the tests with cobalt chloride paper, essentially the same method was used as that described by Livingston (8) and recently employed by Bakke (1). Small squares of thin filter paper, impregnated with cobalt chloride, were dried for a few seconds over a thin metal plate, heated by an alcohol lamp, and immediately applied, by means of little glass clips, to the lower surface of the leaf to be tested.…”
Section: The Hygrometric Paper Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foliar characteristic here considered may be directly determined in several ways. (1) The entire aerial part of a plant, or an entire branch, may be enclosed in a chamber and the rate of transpiration may be measured for any given set of conditions (temperature, humidity, wind velocity, etc.). If the surrounding conditions remain the same and the rate of water-loss varies from period to period these variations must be due to internal conditions and the different observed rates should be proportional to the various degrees of transpiring power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%