In a paper discussing the protein content and acidity of human urine, von Hoesslin in 1909 suggested that a direct relationship existed between the hydrogen ion content and the protein content of human urine (1). Since then clinicians occasionally have commented on this relationship, some to confirm its existence (2, 3) and at least one to deny it (4). These comments usually have been based on the observation of patients thought to have proteinuria of the "benign" or "physiological" variety-e.g., orthostatic albuminuria. The present investigation was undertaken when a review of the pertinent publications since 1909 failed to reveal any formal laboratory study of the effect of pH on protein metabolism in the kidney. The study was designed to provide at least partial answers to two major questions. First, in mammals, do changes in the rate of urinary protein excretion accompany variations in the systemic and urinary hydrogen ion concentrations? Second, if such changes do occur, are they the result of changes in the filtration and/or reabsorption of protein within the kidney?In these experiments the adult male rat was selected to represent the mammalian order, since rat urine is known to contain significant amounts of protein under normal conditions (5). In addition, the use of a laboratory animal afforded ready access to renal tissue in which the formation of "protein absorption droplets" (6) within the cells of the proximal convoluted tubules could be studied histologically.The results of this investigation show that significant changes in urinary protein excretion accompany systemic acid-base disturbances in the male rat and suggest that this phenomenon is the * Supported by a grant from the Heart Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania. Portions of this work have appeared in abstract form (Clin. Res. 1960, 8, 228
MATERIALS AND METHODSGeneral experimental conditions. Male Wistar rats weighing 185 to 213 g were housed in individual metabolic cages. They were fed Purina Dog Chow pellets for at least 24 hours preceding each experimental period. During urine collection periods solid food was withdrawn to minimize contamination of the urine by food particles, and the animals were given a solution of 15 per cent glucose in distilled water, thus insuring adequate volumes (7) of relatively clean urine. The urines were collected from screened funnels beneath each cage over periods of time ranging from 8 to 24 hours. Toluene and mineral oil were not routinely used in the collection containers, since preliminary observations indicated that only minimal urinary pH changes took place in the absence of these preservatives. These urines provided a control baseline against which the urines from subsequent experiments were compared. Variations in the systemic and urinary pH's of these and additional animals were produced by the addition of 1 per cent NH4C1, 5 per cent NaHCO, 0.5 per cent (NHj)2C0,, or 0.04 per cent acetazolamide (Diamox 1) to the 155 per cent glucose in their drinking water. While the animals drank their assig...