2004
DOI: 10.1021/ja046189m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Mechanism of the Photo-Induced DNA Damage in the Presence of Acridizinium SaltsInvolvement of Singlet Oxygen and an Unusual Source for Hydroxyl Radicals

Abstract: Mechanistic investigations of the photoinduced DNA damage by acridizinium salts (4a-azonia-anthracene derivatives) are presented. Irradiation of 9-bromoacridizinium in the presence of defined double- and single-stranded DNA oligomers under aerobic conditions leads to both frank strand breaks and alkali-labile sites as determined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The extent of the DNA damage increases significantly in D(2)O and occurs selectively at guanosine residues. These observations reveal the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35,36] The high reactivity of electronically excited species towards biological materials constitutes a subject matter of 'photobiology without light' and is of prime concern in terms of photooxidative damage of biomolecules (most prominently, DNA). [37][38][39][40] Lipid peroxidation (LPO) induces peroxidative destruction of cell membranes and thereby leads to a loss of their functional integrity and formation of early (such as dienic conjugates, DC) and terminal (such as malondialdehyde, MDA) LPO products. [18][19][20][21][41][42][43][44][45][46] In turn, diverse LPO products (peroxides, oxides, aldehydes, ketones, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35,36] The high reactivity of electronically excited species towards biological materials constitutes a subject matter of 'photobiology without light' and is of prime concern in terms of photooxidative damage of biomolecules (most prominently, DNA). [37][38][39][40] Lipid peroxidation (LPO) induces peroxidative destruction of cell membranes and thereby leads to a loss of their functional integrity and formation of early (such as dienic conjugates, DC) and terminal (such as malondialdehyde, MDA) LPO products. [18][19][20][21][41][42][43][44][45][46] In turn, diverse LPO products (peroxides, oxides, aldehydes, ketones, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first example of using CB[n] host molecules of different sizes to control fluorescence intensity as a result of the binding stoichiometries between the cyclic hosts and the fluorophore guests. Both ADZ + and AADZ + are dyes, [16][17][18][19][20] which are intensely colored and have the propensity towards efficient emission properties, whose fluorescence may be used as a probe and as an intercalating DNAdamaging chromophore. [16][17][18] In addition, N-aryl-9-aminosubstituted acridizinium derivatives have been reported to act as fluorescent "light-up" probes for DNA and protein detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ADZ + and AADZ + are dyes, [16][17][18][19][20] which are intensely colored and have the propensity towards efficient emission properties, whose fluorescence may be used as a probe and as an intercalating DNAdamaging chromophore. [16][17][18] In addition, N-aryl-9-aminosubstituted acridizinium derivatives have been reported to act as fluorescent "light-up" probes for DNA and protein detection. [18] Another phenomenon observed for ADZ + and AADZ + cations was that increasing the concentrations A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (>10 À2 m) of these fluorophores resulted in a decrease in their fluorescence intensity (quenching) and a redshift of the emission wavelength maxima.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] It was demonstrated for benzo [b]quinolizinium derivatives that the quenching of the emission is mainly caused by a photoinduced electron-transfer reaction between the excited quinolizinium and the nucleic bases. [23] Although the photometric titrations clearly reveal multiple binding modes (see above), the plots of the relative emission intensity versus concentration of DNA appear as monophasic binding isotherms. This observation indicates essentially similar quenching efficiencies of the differently bound ligands, that is, the fractional emission quenching relates directly to the fraction of the bound ligand, independent of the binding mode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%