1935
DOI: 10.1007/bf02982210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the inheritance of resistance to wart disease (Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc.) in potatoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1938
1938
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and S. spegazzinii Bitt.. Nowadays, most modern German cultivars have one or more nematode resistance genes from these species. After a seriously raging wart epidemic in 1910, caused by the fungus Synchytrium endobioticum , genes for resistance to S. endobioticum were found in some wild species [20, 21] and have been used for a long time for successful prevention [22, 23]. As briefly summarized above, resistance breeding in Europe has an intricate history and is based on the frequent use of wild species germplasm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and S. spegazzinii Bitt.. Nowadays, most modern German cultivars have one or more nematode resistance genes from these species. After a seriously raging wart epidemic in 1910, caused by the fungus Synchytrium endobioticum , genes for resistance to S. endobioticum were found in some wild species [20, 21] and have been used for a long time for successful prevention [22, 23]. As briefly summarized above, resistance breeding in Europe has an intricate history and is based on the frequent use of wild species germplasm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers illustrate well how successful the breeders were in selecting for P1 resistance in their breeding programs. Indeed, varieties such as Abundance, Flourball, Irish Cobbler, Jubel and Majestic were used in many crosses as P1-resistant parent (Black 1935;Lunden and Jørstad 1934;Weiss 1925), albeit Irish Cobbler does not contain PotVar0067008. In the GWAS panel, we observed that Sen1 was especially selected in the starch and processing potatoes programs, where ~ 75% of the varieties from the 'starch' structure group have Sen1, including 20% in two copies.…”
Section: A Historical Interpretation Of Sen1 Distribution In Potato Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, wart-resistant genotypes were found among the progeny of certain susceptible parents. Salaman and Lesly (1923) and Black (1935) hypothesized that at least two genes were responsible for resistance. Other studies (Lunden and Jørstad 1934; Maris 1973; Lellbach and Effmert 1990) concluded that a single dominant gene controls resistance, sometimes in combination with other, the resistance phenotype modifying or suppressing genes.…”
Section: Genetics Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivation of resistant varieties and strict quarantine measures effectively curtailed the spreading of potato wart. This success was made possible by the pioneering work of the early scientists, who discovered and classified the causal pathogen (Schilberszky 1896; Percival 1910), described its life cycle and pathogenesis (Curtis 1921; Glynne 1926), developed methods for resistance screening (Spieckermann and Kothoff 1924; Glynne 1925; Lemmerzahl 1930) and studied the inheritance of resistance to wart (Salaman and Lesly 1923; Lunden and Jørstad 1934; Black 1935). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%