1968
DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.68-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the european hare. XVII. Estimation of European hare population density depending on the width of the assessment belt

Abstract: The average results of assessment and estimation of variations in density were compared, using assessment belts 50, 100 and 150 m. in width. Timidity and distribution of the hares in space were also examined. Over-estimation of numbers decreases with an increase in the width of the assessment belt. A belt 50 m wide is too narrow to assess numbers correctly, as results are distinctly over-estimated when this width is used. The occurrence of hares in concentrations, and their starting up in whole groups tend to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The densities recorded in the study area in spring and autumn are comparable to those found in north and central Europe, though in very different environmental conditions (Jezierski 1968, Rajska 1968, Bresiñski 1976b, Bresiriski and Chlewski 1976, Pepin and Birkan 1981, Frylestam 1981a, Barnes et al 1983, Swihart 1986). The recruitment of population and the winter mortality appear on the contrary very different.…”
Section: Densities and Numerical Changessupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The densities recorded in the study area in spring and autumn are comparable to those found in north and central Europe, though in very different environmental conditions (Jezierski 1968, Rajska 1968, Bresiñski 1976b, Bresiriski and Chlewski 1976, Pepin and Birkan 1981, Frylestam 1981a, Barnes et al 1983, Swihart 1986). The recruitment of population and the winter mortality appear on the contrary very different.…”
Section: Densities and Numerical Changessupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Density is simply based on the number of different hares recorded divided by the total belt area covered. The method has been verified by comparing results from clearance counts with those of belt assessments in the same regions (Pielowski, 1969), and assessing the effect of using belts of different widths (Rajska, 1968). These authors concluded that belt assessments consistently tended to overestimate actual numbers by around 20%.…”
Section: Wide Belt Assessment Using a Line Of Several Beatersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This error was due to problems with perspective; the widths of the belt as seen by an assessor gazing forwards appear to narrow towards the horizon and therefore some hares outside the belt were recorded as originating within the belt. Rajska (1968) compared belt widths of 50, 100 and 150 m and suggested that this effect is more severe the narrower the belt and therefore advised against the use of a 50-m belt. The degree to which perspective influences the count will be influenced by how well the boundaries of the belt are marked in the field.…”
Section: Wide Belt Assessment Using a Line Of Several Beatersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spot counts, counting takes place at fixed spots, preferably at night using spotlights; this method is often used and produces good results (Barnes & Tapper 1985). In belt counts, transects about 100 m wide are walked by a line of drivers (no fewer than one per 15 m) during the day in representative sub-areas (Rajska 1968, Pielowski 1969, Frylestam 1981, Langbein et al 1999. However, the validation of this method with other absolute methods has shown that such belt counts lead to systematic and substantial overestimates of the population (Rajska 1968, Pielowski 1969.…”
Section: Choice Of Count Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%