1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1999.00040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for assessing the abundance of Brown Hares Lepus europaeus

Abstract: Over the last few decades, there have been significant declines in Brown Hare Lepus europaeus numbers throughout Europe, leading to concern for their status in many countries. In Britain, there were no quantified data on the extent of this decline, on current population levels, or any baseline against which to monitor future population changes. The need for a quantified national hare survey led to this evaluation of the techniques available to assess hare numbers. Published information on counting hares is rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We determined hare and cottontail habitat use by searching for the presence of faecal pellets in random plots (1-m radius) scattered in the study areas in each season (200 plots in area A, 150 in area B and 150 in area C). This technique can be applied over a large area and provides data on seasonal habitat use patterns of hares and cottontails (Swihart and Yahner 1984;Litvaitis et al 1985a, b;Langbein et al 1999). Each plot was cleaned at the beginning of the survey and in each season pellets were removed from plots when found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined hare and cottontail habitat use by searching for the presence of faecal pellets in random plots (1-m radius) scattered in the study areas in each season (200 plots in area A, 150 in area B and 150 in area C). This technique can be applied over a large area and provides data on seasonal habitat use patterns of hares and cottontails (Swihart and Yahner 1984;Litvaitis et al 1985a, b;Langbein et al 1999). Each plot was cleaned at the beginning of the survey and in each season pellets were removed from plots when found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dropping counts are commonly regarded as good indicators of grazing activity for both geese (Owen 1971) and hare (Langbein et al 1999).…”
Section: Biomass Calculations and Feeding Guildsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new protocol was introduced, quantifying the fecal pellets along the shore line of the water, which was called fecal taxation (FTX). Counting fecal pellets is a common method for estimating the abundance of fleeing animals (11,19,33), but to our knowledge, it has not been applied to wild birds. Along the current shore lines of the pools, fecal pellets were counted within a 100-m-long and 1-m-wide strip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For estimating fecal pellet production, a new approach was introduced, quantifying the fecal pellets along the shoreline of the water. The use of fecal pellets to trace the abundance of wild animals has been used several times (11,19,33), but to our knowledge, no attempt has been made to use this method for birds. In addition, a set of environmental variables was monitored to better understand the relationship between bird abundance, fecal pellet production, and the abundance of FIB as well as to clarify which group of FIB is best suited for indicating fecal pollution by waterfowl in these modestly saline environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%