1969
DOI: 10.1626/jcs.38.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Differences of Photosynthesis among Species : I. Differences in the response of photosynthesis among species in normal oxygen concentration as influenced by some environmental factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They require more light than Calvin plants for saturation of net photosynthesis at 300 ppm CO2 (112,113,115,171,172) , and they usually exhibit faster ratcs of light-saturated net photosynthesis than Calvin-cycle or CAM plants. Also, the C. plants achieve optimum net photosynthesis at warmer leaf temperatures (2,27,85,113,118,171,172). Downton (71) and Berry (23) have reported some physiological differentiation in photosynthetic systems among plants which are currently described as having the C.-dicarboxylic acid pathway.…”
Section: Photosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They require more light than Calvin plants for saturation of net photosynthesis at 300 ppm CO2 (112,113,115,171,172) , and they usually exhibit faster ratcs of light-saturated net photosynthesis than Calvin-cycle or CAM plants. Also, the C. plants achieve optimum net photosynthesis at warmer leaf temperatures (2,27,85,113,118,171,172). Downton (71) and Berry (23) have reported some physiological differentiation in photosynthetic systems among plants which are currently described as having the C.-dicarboxylic acid pathway.…”
Section: Photosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations of Figs 2 and 3, C,,,,,^ for RuBP carboxylase was taken as a eonstant but there is evidenee in some species that the state of aetivation of the enzyme deereases at lower light intensities (see Taylor & Terry, 1984), Also, several studies have shown that the earboxylation eflieieney decreases with deereasing light intensities (Akita, Miyasaka, & Murata, 1969;Taylor & Terry, 1984;Weber et al, 1987), While more experimental data is needed on the state of aetivation of the enzyme under varying [CO,] and photon flux densities with dilTerent speeies, an example of the elfect of increasing aetivation of RuBP earboxylase on photosynthesis with increasing photon flux density ean be illustrated with the present model. In Fig, 4a, the response of A' (from eqn 22) is shown where the state of aetivation of RuBP earboxylase remains constant (solid circles) compared with an inerease in the state of activation of RuBP earboxylase with increasing photon flux density based on a study of Taylor & Terry (1984) (open eircles).…”
Section: Simulations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the methods so far described, E, xi and xa were obtained, so that the total diffusive resistance to water vapour transfer (ra+rs) was also given from eq. (1).…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%