1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(99)00167-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on product distributions of iron and cobalt catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
125
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The products from Fischer-Tropsch process generally follow the statistical hydrocarbon distribution-Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) distribution [63]. The molar fraction M of a certain carbon number of n can be described as: (18) So product distribution can be determined by the chain growth probability α value.…”
Section: Fischer-tropsch Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The products from Fischer-Tropsch process generally follow the statistical hydrocarbon distribution-Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) distribution [63]. The molar fraction M of a certain carbon number of n can be described as: (18) So product distribution can be determined by the chain growth probability α value.…”
Section: Fischer-tropsch Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focused on these deviations from the ideal ASF distribution and some researchers have been successful in representing the deviation by superposition of two ASF distributions [7±9]. Theories based in the superposition of two ASF distributions rely on the dual site theory [3], secondary chain growth of readsorbed alkenes theory [6,10], and the dual mechanism of chain growth theory [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter estimates together with their 95% individual confidence intervals are given in Table 3. Activation energies for the reverse elementary steps, calculated with the reaction enthalpy at 623 K with Equation (19), are also included in this table. Individual reaction enthalpies for the different carbon numbers are used and, hence, different reverse activation energies are obtained.…”
Section: Regression Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deviations have been observed for iron, cobalt and ruthenium catalysts and have been interpreted as the superposition of two or more ASF distributions, attributed to different factors, e.g., the existence of structurally different sites leading to different growth probabilities [18] or the existence of more than one chain growth mechanism [19]. In general, the most accepted explanation is the re-adsorption and re-incorporation of 1-alkenes in the chain growth [17,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%