1970
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x00021970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Echinochasmus perfoliantus (Ratz, 1908) Dietz, 1909: Incidence in Dogs and Development of the Miracidium

Abstract: Chand ler (1925) described Echinochasmus perfoliatns as a common parasite of Indian dogs in Calcutta. Bhalerao (1936) reported its occurrence in cats of Calcutta and Mukteswar and Patnaik (1959) in dogs of Orissa. Maplestone and Bhaduri (1940) reported Echinochasmus sp. from dogs in Calcutta. Gupta and Pand e (19G3) mentioned that Echinochasmus is represented in Indian carnivores by three species: E. perfoliatns, E. corvus (Syn. E. caninum) and E. canai.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pattern of 18 epidermal plates arranged in four rows: 6 : 6 : 4 : 2 was described by Karmanova (1971Karmanova ( , 1973 for miracidia o f E. b u r s ic o la (Creplin, 1837) and for E. sp in osu s Odhner, 1910, andby Sahai &Srivastava (1970) for miracidia o f a parasite from India identified as E. p e rfo lia tu s . A pattern o f 20 epidermal plates, arranged in four rows: 6:8:4:2 was described by Karmanova (1974) for miracidia o f E. c o a x a tu s (Dietz, 1909).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A pattern of 18 epidermal plates arranged in four rows: 6 : 6 : 4 : 2 was described by Karmanova (1971Karmanova ( , 1973 for miracidia o f E. b u r s ic o la (Creplin, 1837) and for E. sp in osu s Odhner, 1910, andby Sahai &Srivastava (1970) for miracidia o f a parasite from India identified as E. p e rfo lia tu s . A pattern o f 20 epidermal plates, arranged in four rows: 6:8:4:2 was described by Karmanova (1974) for miracidia o f E. c o a x a tu s (Dietz, 1909).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%