2013
DOI: 10.5376/pgt.2010.01.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Choice of Parents and Gene Action in Rice Hybrids Involving Yield and Physiological Traits under Aerobic Condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This showed the presence of greater variance of non-additive gene action for all the characters, which offer scope for exploitation of hybrid vigour through heterosis breeding and selection procedure in late or advanced generation will be very important to improve these traits. These results were in agreement with those reported by Hosseini et al (2005) and Malarvizhi et al (2010) for spad chlorophyll meter reading and dry shoot weight in rice, Gnanasekaran et al (2006) for biomass yield in rice, Das et al (2005) for relative water content in rice; Ganesh et al (2004), Sathya and Jebaraj (2013) and Utharasu and Anandakumar (2013) for dry root weight and root/shoot ratio in rice. The GCA effects represent the nature of gene action.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This showed the presence of greater variance of non-additive gene action for all the characters, which offer scope for exploitation of hybrid vigour through heterosis breeding and selection procedure in late or advanced generation will be very important to improve these traits. These results were in agreement with those reported by Hosseini et al (2005) and Malarvizhi et al (2010) for spad chlorophyll meter reading and dry shoot weight in rice, Gnanasekaran et al (2006) for biomass yield in rice, Das et al (2005) for relative water content in rice; Ganesh et al (2004), Sathya and Jebaraj (2013) and Utharasu and Anandakumar (2013) for dry root weight and root/shoot ratio in rice. The GCA effects represent the nature of gene action.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The hybrids viz., ADT (R) 49 x Chinnar 20, ADT 43 x Anna (R) 4, ADT 36 x Anna (R) 4, BPT 5204 x Chinnar 20, CO (R) 50 x Nootripathu and CO (R) 50 x PMK (R) 3 were also found to be specific combiners. Similar results were obtained by Sathya and Jebaraj (2013) for the traits 70 percent relative water content, dry root weight, dry shoot weight and root length in rice. For these combinations, since they involved non-additive gene action, cyclic method of breeding involving selection of desired recombinants and their inter crossing would be more desirable (Muthuramu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Because the parent groups were genetically different, it appears that the SCA was mainly attributable to the difference between the allele frequencies in the parent groups, as the heterosis in the F 2 generation was reduced to half its initial value. However, the absence of dominance is unlikely, as the occurrence in rice of both additive and nonadditive factors (dominance and epistasis) has been reported in several studies (Rutger et al, 1986;Pereira et al, 2008;Sathya and Jebaraj, 2013), although the relationship between these effects is highly dependent on inbreeding (Cockerham, 1963).…”
Section: Gene Action and Combining Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%