1986
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4320(86)90042-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on camel semen. I. Electroejaculation and some aspects of semen characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sperm morphometric measures in this study were similar to those of previous reports (Abdel-Raouf and E1-Naggar, 1976;Tingari et al, 1986). But it was different to one study (Aggarwal et al, 2009) possibly due to the effect of freezing semen on sperm morphology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sperm morphometric measures in this study were similar to those of previous reports (Abdel-Raouf and E1-Naggar, 1976;Tingari et al, 1986). But it was different to one study (Aggarwal et al, 2009) possibly due to the effect of freezing semen on sperm morphology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Different methods of semen collection have been reported for http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.09.016 0378-4320/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. camelids including intravaginal condoms (Johnson, 1989), vaginal sponge (Bravo et al, 2013), fistulation of the urethra (Bravo et al, 2000), electroejaculation (Tingari et al, 1986), post-copulatory vaginal aspiration (Bravo et al, 2000), and artificial vagina (Mosaferi et al, 2005). These methods have advantages and disadvantages affecting semen quality and the length of time necessary for collecting semen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar observations have been reported for cattle [20,22] and sheep [17]. High variability in ejaculate volume and sperm concentrations has also been reported in samples collected from alpacas by electroejaculation [9] and by AV [23], and in samples from camels [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One ejaculate was collected from each fertile and infertile camel during the rutting season using electroejaculation method as described earlier [17]. The ejaculate was assessed for routine semen quality parameters such as ejaculate volume (mL), viscosity [18] and pH, percent progressively motile sperm, sperm concentration (Â10 6 /mL), and percent sperm abnormalities by the same trained individual using Sperm Vision 3.5 (Minitube of America, Inc.).…”
Section: Camels and Semen Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%