1995
DOI: 10.1021/bp00033a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Affinity Constants of Hapten‐Specific Monoclonal Antibodies Using an Antibody‐Immobilized ELISA

Abstract: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure affinity constants of hapten-specific monoclonal antibodies has been developed. In this method an antibody-immobilizing format is used. Antibody affinity toward hapten-enzyme tracer is first calculated by using Scatchard's method. Using this affinity, antibody-hapten affinity is then calculated by following the principles of chemical thermodynamics and mass conservation. The affinity from this method agrees with the IC50 values in ELISA. This method is useful in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of the galactose-ricin dissociation constant is therefore uncertain, as is the magnitude of the dissociation constant, because the latter is a function of the ricin-asialofetuin dissociation constant, which, as explained above, is only an approximation. This may explain why the value of the dissociation constant (K i ) that was determined in the present work (83 M) is lower than that reported using other methods (149-590 M; Refs 7,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Binding Of Ricin To Asialofetuin and Inhibition Of Binding Bcontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interpretation of the galactose-ricin dissociation constant is therefore uncertain, as is the magnitude of the dissociation constant, because the latter is a function of the ricin-asialofetuin dissociation constant, which, as explained above, is only an approximation. This may explain why the value of the dissociation constant (K i ) that was determined in the present work (83 M) is lower than that reported using other methods (149-590 M; Refs 7,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Binding Of Ricin To Asialofetuin and Inhibition Of Binding Bcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…where A 0 is the rate of absorbance change in the absence of inhibitor, A is the rate of change of absorbance in the presence of inhibitor of concentration I, K i is the ricin-inhibitor dissociation constant, R is the concentration of ricin and K r is the ricin-asialofetuin dissociation constant. 22 Equation (3) Fig. 5 (open circles), from which the linearity of the relationship is evident.…”
Section: Inhibition By Galactosementioning
confidence: 92%
“…where A 0 is the rate of absorbance change in the absence of inhibitor, A is the rate of change of absorbance in the presence of inhibitor of concentration I, K i is the toxininhibitor dissociation constant, T is the concentration of cholera toxin and K t is the toxin-G M1 dissociation constant (Chu et al, 1995). The equation predicts that a plot of A 0 /A vs I will be linear with an intercept of 1 and a slope of [K i (1 + T/K t )] −1 ; K i therefore can be determined by knowing T and K t .…”
Section: Inhibition and Reversibility Of Toxin Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative strength of the antibody-antigen interaction is estimated using their affinity constants (Harlow & Lane, 1988a) which can be determined experimentally by immunoassay (Chu et al, 1995), fluorescence methods (Bruggeman et al, 1995), and surface plasmon resonance (Pellequer & Vanregenmortel, 1993). However, none of these methods can be used to directly measure the strength of the antigenantibody bond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%