“…If one takes even a cursory, objective view of the literature, there is ample evidence to convince the reader that certain peptides or other unidentified pineal substances may be considered potentially as important to pineal function as MEL. In pineal extracts several different activities have been observed which cannot be explained on the basis of their content of MEL, 5-methoxytryptophol, 5-hydroxytryptophol or other pineal indoles to which an antigonadotropic activity is ascribed [Thieblot et al, 1967; Moszk ow sk a and E bels, 1971; Benson et al, 1972a;E bels et al, 1973;E bels, 1975O rts, 1977], At this time no known pineal compound satisfies all the classical criteria for a candidate hormone, i.e., a substance produced exclusively in the pineal gland and having a specific functional influence in a distant target organ(s). And whereas the presentation of a review on the status of pineal peptides might at first appear appropriate at this time, it may indeed be premature since the significance of the structurally identified and unidentified 'peptides' found in pineal tissue is not fully understood.…”