Density and relative viscosity data have been obtained
for lithium
chloride (LiCl), sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl),
potassium bromide (KBr), cesium bromide (CsBr), tetramethylammonium
bromide (Me4NBr), tetraethylammonium bromide (Et4NBr), tetrabutylammonium bromide (Bu4NBr), and promethazine
hydrochloride (PM·HCl) salts (1:1 electrolytes) at various concentrations
in aqueous 8 M urea solutions at 298.15 K. Similar data also have
been obtained for aqueous 8 M urea solutions containing ethanol and
tertiary butanol at 298.15 K. The apparent molar volumes of solute
at finite concentration (V
ϕ) and
apparent molar volumes of solute at infinite dilution (V
ϕ
0) are
calculated at 298.15 K. The viscosity coefficients A and B of the Jones–Dole equation have been
obtained for all studied systems at 298.15 K. The V
ϕ
0, A, and B viscosity coefficient values obtained
are compared with the similar data for aqueous solutions of the studied
salts and alcohols (i.e., without the addition of urea) at 298.15
K. In protein denaturation studies, the addition of urea is made as
a perturbant which is important; however, the exact mechanism of denaturation
by urea is not known yet. The differences in binary and ternary aqueous
solutions are expected on the basis of the solvent effects (water
structural effects). The transfer partial molar volumes (from water
to urea solutions) and transfer viscosity coefficients B have been estimated. The transfer values for alcohols are positive.
The drug promethazine hydrochloride forms micelles in aqueous solutions.
The results of this system have been explained on the basis of positive
ΔV
ϕ
0 and viscosity coefficient A (which increases), meaning that in urea solutions, there is an increase
in ion–ion and ion-pairing interactions. The results are discussed
in terms of decrease in hydrophobic interactions and stacking of drug
molecules in the premicellar concentration region due to specific
drug cation–urea interactions, probably due to the formation
of complex aggregates.