“…Intravenously injected 59Fe by contrast is more rapidly incorporated into red cell precursors in the erythropoietic tissues. However, since under normal conditions iron returned to the metabolic pool from destroyed red cells is largely re-utilized for new taemoglobin synthesis (Gibson, Aub, Evans, Peacock, Irvine & Sack, 1947) it is Escober & Baldwin (1934) Creskoff & Fitzhugh (1937) Harne, Lutz & Davis (1938) Ponticorvo, Rittenberg & Bloch (1949) Berlin, Huff & Hennessy (1951Berlin, Meyer & Lazarus (1951 Berlin & Lotz (1951) Fryers & Berlin (1952) Berlin, Van Dyke & Lotz (1953) Burwell, Brickley & Finch (1953) Davis, Alpen & Davis (1955) Van Dyke, Asling, Berlin & Harrison (1955) Donohue, Motulsky, Giblett, Pirzio-Biroli, Viranuvatti & Finch (1955) Giblett, Motulsky, Casserd, Houghton & Finch (1956) Hall, Nash & Hall (1957) The use of 51Cr in red cell survival studies is complicated by the fact that the 51Cr concentration in the blood falls more rapidly than would be expected from red cell destruction alone, a finding usually explained in terms of a slow elution of the isotopic label from the red cells in the circulation. Measurements of the 5lCr content of the blood must therefore be corrected for elution loss if true survival is to be estimated.…”