2022
DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v5i1.811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STUDENTS’ PROBLEM OF TAKING TOEFL TEST AT STMIK ROYAL ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021

Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor pengambilan ujian TOEFL dan menemukan penyebab permasalahan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran TOEFL yang dihadapi oleh mahasiswa STMIK Royal di Kisaran. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) untuk mengetahui keterampilan yang paling banyak dijawab salah dalam TOEFL oleh International Language Training Center (ILTC) (2) untuk mendeskripsikan bagaimana mempersiapkan siswa untuk TOEFL; (3) untuk menganalisis alasan mahasiswa terhadap masalah mereka dalam TOEFL oleh In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears to me that, to a substantial extent, the use of technology in these ways supports language teaching rather than language learning , which raises concerns about how students can improve the intelligibility of their oral production when they work on their own (e.g., Cepik & Yastibas, 2013; Dang & T. T. T. Tran, 2021; Mulyadi et al, 2021; T. V. A. Nguyen & Le, 2020). Some cases do involve student learning but are liable to encounter a variety of obstacles associated with the personalisation of the teaching content (e.g., Saed et al, 2021; Saepuloh et al, 2021), the availability of materials that suit students’ level of proficiency (e.g., Bui, 2020; Maulana, 2018), the availability of human resources (e.g., T. M. L. Nguyen, 2019), or a heavy dependence on learners’ own ability to adapt to the linguistic level of the input (e.g., Bahrani, 2011; Safitri & Khoiriyah, 2017). These hindrances can be exaggerated in contexts where teachers must work within a mandated syllabus or curriculum (e.g., Vietnam) in which the materials and resources to be used are already selected for them.…”
Section: Technology‐enhanced Teaching Of L2 Speakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It appears to me that, to a substantial extent, the use of technology in these ways supports language teaching rather than language learning , which raises concerns about how students can improve the intelligibility of their oral production when they work on their own (e.g., Cepik & Yastibas, 2013; Dang & T. T. T. Tran, 2021; Mulyadi et al, 2021; T. V. A. Nguyen & Le, 2020). Some cases do involve student learning but are liable to encounter a variety of obstacles associated with the personalisation of the teaching content (e.g., Saed et al, 2021; Saepuloh et al, 2021), the availability of materials that suit students’ level of proficiency (e.g., Bui, 2020; Maulana, 2018), the availability of human resources (e.g., T. M. L. Nguyen, 2019), or a heavy dependence on learners’ own ability to adapt to the linguistic level of the input (e.g., Bahrani, 2011; Safitri & Khoiriyah, 2017). These hindrances can be exaggerated in contexts where teachers must work within a mandated syllabus or curriculum (e.g., Vietnam) in which the materials and resources to be used are already selected for them.…”
Section: Technology‐enhanced Teaching Of L2 Speakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a close examination of current pedagogical practices reveals critical limitations associated with student learning and its applicability. For example, those teachers who use videos (e.g., Maulana, 2018) might have difficulties finding the ones that suit their teaching content and students’ proficiency, while those using Flipgrid to manage students’ recordings (e.g., T. K. O. Hoang & T. H. V. Nguyen, 2020) seem to assume that students can manage to improve their spoken English intelligibility themselves. Evidently, there is a call for a technology‐mediated language pedagogy for teaching oral English which more effectively facilitates student learning and gives teachers the flexibility and convenience to adapt to a range of teaching contexts and materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%