2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3524610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Executive SummaryIn search of better, more cost effective ways to deliver instruction and training, universities and corporations have expanded their use of e-learning. Although several studies suggest that online education and blended instruction (a "blend" of online and traditional approaches) can be as effective as traditional classroom models, few studies have focused on learner satisfaction with online instruction, particularly in the transition to online learning from traditional approaches. This study e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
130
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
6
130
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to SES, we also investigate gender differences in perceptions of e‐learning systems. Results of prior studies on gender effects in perceptions and satisfaction with online learning are mixed; some find no differences between genders (Hill & Chidambaram, 2000; Koohang & Durante, 2003; Smart & Cappel, 2006), and others find that gender does play a role in students’ perceptions of online courses (Sullivan, 2001; Womble, 2008; Tanner et. al., 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to SES, we also investigate gender differences in perceptions of e‐learning systems. Results of prior studies on gender effects in perceptions and satisfaction with online learning are mixed; some find no differences between genders (Hill & Chidambaram, 2000; Koohang & Durante, 2003; Smart & Cappel, 2006), and others find that gender does play a role in students’ perceptions of online courses (Sullivan, 2001; Womble, 2008; Tanner et. al., 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students’ perceptions of the differences between online and traditional classes vary across demographic groups (Aggarwal & Bento, 2000; Rea et al, 2000; Tanner, Noser, & Totaro, 2009). These differences are a concern to educators as perceptions and attitudes greatly influence students’ motivation and ability to learn as well as their comfort with online learning (Howland & Moore, 2002; Koohang & Durante, 2003; Smart & Cappel, 2006). One suggested cause for differences in students’ perceptions of online learning are individual characteristics such as gender, Internet experience, major, first language, year in college, learning style, computer self‐efficacy, online learning experience, and age (Tanner, Noser, Fuselier & Totaro 2004; Barakzai & Fraser, 2005; Smart & Cappel, 2006; Ong & Lai, 2006; Arbaugh & Rau, 2007; van der Rhee et al, 2007; Simmering, Posey & Piccoli, 2009; Tanner et.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hybrid courses become more popular, research is accumulating on the positive outcomes from using the approach, but less has been published about how faculty design and teach blended courses [21]. According to Smart and Cappel [26], what is known about effective learning should be the "starting point" for designing blended instruction. They emphasize the importance of selecting technology tools that make learning activities more authentic, enable students to become more active in their learning, and require students to interact with others and engage in critical or deeper-level thinking.…”
Section: B Design and Implementation Of Blended Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no one standard approach for a blended course; however, regardless of blend format, the course design must consider the following key elements of effective blended learning (Martyn, 2003;Smart and Cappel, 2006;Lin, 2007;Kenney and Newcombe, 2011;Deschacht and Goeman, 2015):…”
Section: Design and Development Phasementioning
confidence: 99%