2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Status– and Gender‐Based Differences in Students’ Perceptions of E‐Learning Systems

Abstract: Many universities are pursuing increases in on-line course offerings as a means of offsetting the rising costs of providing high-quality educational opportunities and of better serving their student populations. However, enrollments in online courses are not always sufficient to cover their costs. One possible way of improving enrollments is through marketing campaigns targeted to specific demographic groups. In this study, we take a first look into how students' perceptions of e-learning systems, prior to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference between the male and female perceptions was significant: t(592) = 4.84, p < 0.001. The findings contrast research by [1] who did not find much significant difference between men and women's perception of electronic learning. The difference between our results and [1]'s findings highlights that while gender may not be a factor to consider in perceptions of electronic learning platforms, it does affect the perceive benefits of SNS in education.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…This difference between the male and female perceptions was significant: t(592) = 4.84, p < 0.001. The findings contrast research by [1] who did not find much significant difference between men and women's perception of electronic learning. The difference between our results and [1]'s findings highlights that while gender may not be a factor to consider in perceptions of electronic learning platforms, it does affect the perceive benefits of SNS in education.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The gender gap in educational devices and technologies has interested educational scholars and researchers. Various perceptual factors associated with gender differences have been explored in previous research (Albert & Johnson, 2011;Chu, 2010;González-Gómez , Guardiola, Rodríguez & Alonso, 2012;Ong & Lai, 2006). The enormous growth of m-learning makes it necessary to reexamine the gender issue which has been an object of research in education.…”
Section: Gender Difference Toward Educational Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, student performance in earlier core course was found to be the strongest predictor of academic success. Finally, Albert and Johnson (2011) found little difference between genders in their perceptions of e-learning systems. Educational issues and challenges for international students studying in business schools have also been studied in a wide variety of contexts.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Gender and Residencymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, student performance in earlier core course was found to be the strongest predictor of academic success. Finally, Albert and Johnson (2011) found little difference between genders in their perceptions of e‐learning systems.…”
Section: Student Perceptions Of the Assignment And Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 83%