Student Voice, Student Engagement, And School Reform

Abstract

The movement of education quality improvement through school reform by creating a superior school paradigm design and new student acceptance model (PPDB) has a strategic position to condition the school to keep abreast of developments and changing times, so as to have the ability to adjust the new paradigm in the global era, The role to serve education equally and fairly in all levels of society. Thus the quantity and quality of Indonesian human resources as the key to success in creating a glorious national development.

La participación del alumnado en la vida del centro: una aproximación desde la comunidad educativa

“…Parafraseando a Mayor Zaragoza (1989) en "mañana siempre es tarde", las niñas y los niños como sujetos de derechos deben experimentarlos de forma objetiva y consciente en la escuela. Esto supone renunciar a lo que se ha llamado la "ideología de la inmadurez" y la visión adultocéntrica, a partir de la cual seguimos pensando recursos para la infancia obviando su parecer (Pulido Valero, Calderón López, Martín-Seoane, & Lucas-Molina, 2014;Rudduck & Flutter, 2007;Rudduck, 2007).…”

Working the Crevices: Granting Students Authority in Authoritarian Schools

“…Rudduck (2007) has noted that "the potential of student involvement will not be fully realized, and certainly not sustained, if it does not reach out beyond the individual teacher . .…”

“…The student voice movement, initiated in the 1970s as part of the students' rights initiative and strengthened by the recent emphasis on the child-as-consumer (Rudduck 2007), maintains that it is both morally right and educationally effective to take seriously the perspectives of students (Pollard et al 1997). At the lowest level of agency, students raise issues and offer opinions to teachers who listen attentively (Holdsworth 2000;Mitra 2007).…”

“…Holdsworth (2000) has identified six levels: speaking out, being heard, being listened to, being seriously listened to, incorporating views into actions, and sharing decision making/implementation. The yield is enhanced agency, belonging, and competence (Mitra 2004;also Cook-Sather 2002;Holdsworth 2000;Rudduck 2007;Ruddock and Demetriou 2003).…”

“…CHRISTINA SANABRIA is the grants coordinator at Legal Services Corporation, Washington, DC. gagement and commitment (Cook-Sather 2006;Mitra 2004;Rudduck 2007;Rudduck and Demetriou 2003). For analytic and pragmatic purposes, it is important to refine the nature (as well as the extent) of agency and determine what aspects we want to promote and under what circumstances.…”