2017
DOI: 10.1108/qae-12-2016-0088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student’s perceptions of quality learning in a Malaysian university – a mixed method approach

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to examine students’ perceptions of quality learning using a mixed-methods approach in a Malaysian university, with an aim to fill existing knowledge gaps in the literature on relationships among relevant quality variables. The study also assesses the extent to which detailed results from a few participants can be generalised to a larger sample from the population. Design/methodology/approach A sequential, mixed-methods approach was used to obtain a more meaningful and balanced analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A learning outcome is a change in a student's learning experience and it is reflective of the quality of learning (Choy, Yim, & Tan, 2017). In other words, a learning outcome is what a student can perform now, something that they could not previously do.…”
Section: Assessment Of Perceived Learning Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A learning outcome is a change in a student's learning experience and it is reflective of the quality of learning (Choy, Yim, & Tan, 2017). In other words, a learning outcome is what a student can perform now, something that they could not previously do.…”
Section: Assessment Of Perceived Learning Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a large number of reports and theoretical works on quality from the perspective of quality assurance and quality improvement. In many of them, research scholars have identified different views on the issue of quality education and its determining factors (Biggs, 1995; Ashraf et al, 2008, 2009, 2016; Lim, 2008; Ehlers, 2009; Poole, 2010; Gallifa and Batallé, 2010; Tsinidou et al , 2010; Vnoučková et al , 2017; Choy et al , 2017; Rodriguez et al , 2018). However, a very limited empirical work is available on this particular issue of quality management in the case of Bangladeshi private higher educational institutions (Ashraf et al , 2009).…”
Section: Underlying Theory and Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a large number of reports and theoretical works on quality education from the perspective of quality assurance and quality improvement. In many of them, research scholars have identified different views on the issue of quality education and its determining factors (Ashraf et al, 2008(Ashraf et al, , 2009(Ashraf et al, , 2016Biggs, 1991;Choy et al, 2017;Ehlers, 2009;Poole, 2010;Gallifa and Batallé , 2010;Lim, 2008;Rodriguez et al, 2018;Tsinidou et al, 2010;Vnou ckov a et al, 2017). However, a very limited empirical work is available on this particular issue of managing the learning environment in the case of enhancing quality education in Bangladeshi private higher educational institutions.…”
Section: Quality and Quality Education: Concepts And Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%