2018
DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2018.1509425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Peer Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, most students felt that the peer-and selfassessment system supported their learning. This is in broad agreement with the findings of Moneypenny et al (2018) and Wen and Tsai (2006) that most students hold positive attitudes toward peer-assessment and find it to be both effective and helpful to learning.…”
Section: Lecture Videos (2016-2017)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…8, most students felt that the peer-and selfassessment system supported their learning. This is in broad agreement with the findings of Moneypenny et al (2018) and Wen and Tsai (2006) that most students hold positive attitudes toward peer-assessment and find it to be both effective and helpful to learning.…”
Section: Lecture Videos (2016-2017)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Students can experience anxiety and intimidation as they consider the level of responsibility and the amount of time required to mark the work of their peers (Llado, et al, 2014;Moneypenny et al, 2018). In research by Nagori and Cooper (2014), postgraduate students acknowledged questioning both their peer review abilities and those of their classmates, reporting that it had been an unsettling experience.…”
Section: Persistent Issues and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions 1-10 of the instrument (Part One) were based on Kaufman and Shunn's (2011) research survey and were positioned to evaluate students' perceptions regarding online peer assessment. The remaining 20 questions (Parts Two and Three) of the instrument were created based on research by Moneypenny et al (2018) that aligned specifically with Wen and Tsai's (2006) four subscales of peer review. The subscales within the questionnaires were referenced as (1) Positive Attitude Subscale (POS), (2) Online Attitude Subscale (OAS), (3) Understanding-and-Action Subscale (UAS), and (4) Negative Attitude Subscale (NAS).…”
Section: Preterm Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During peer review, students employ critical thinking skills (Demirbilek, 2015;McMahon, 2010), gain insight into different perspectives (Hogg, 2018), and engage writing and organizational skills (Man et al, 2018). Most important, peer review provides the opportunity for student interaction and collaboration within the online environment and encourages the development of a community of learners (Moneypenny et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%