1994
DOI: 10.1080/0950069940160303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student ideas of science concepts: alternative frameworks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
23

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests, although inspired by other sources, were developed in this study. The main sources of inspiration were Kuiper (1994) and Halloun and Hestenes (1985a). The following questions are representative examples from the pre-/postcourse test.…”
Section: Research Methods and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests, although inspired by other sources, were developed in this study. The main sources of inspiration were Kuiper (1994) and Halloun and Hestenes (1985a). The following questions are representative examples from the pre-/postcourse test.…”
Section: Research Methods and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viennot 1979;BouJaoude, 1991;Solomon, 1992Solomon, , 1993Claxton, 1993;Hennessy, 1993;Linder, 1993;Russell, 1993;Kuiper 1994) -and perhaps sometimes simply created in response to the social pressure of the researcher's questions (Solomon 1993). So Hammer argues, Research in science education, including physics, has mostly adopted unitary models of student thinking as reflecting naïve theoretical frameworks, robust misconceptions, and stages of development in reasoning abilities.…”
Section: The Stability Of Student Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there has been a social constructivist/sociocultural trend that has regarded student conceptions as socially situated within the everyday and that the instructors job is not to challenge these conceptions but to enable the student to contextualise the concept with respect to its appropriate domain, whether scientific or everyday (e.g. Linder 1993;Driver et al 1994;Kuiper 1994;Mortimer 1995;Leach & Scott 2003). However, the point is, whether a conceptual change model assumes that 'misconceptions' or intuitive beliefs arise out of the child's interaction with the physical world or, alternatively, as 'ways of speaking' within appropriate or inappropriate domains, nevertheless there seems to be a majority consensus that these conceptions are fairly well formed prior to instruction (and quite contrary to Strike and Posner's revised theory).…”
Section: What Is Conceptual Change? From Spontaneous Reasoning To a Smentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, students need to become aware of the shift in their initial views towards the 'metaconceptual perspectives of science knowledge' (p. 8), which implies change, not enrichment. Indeed, Linder's (1993) 'conceptual appreciation delimited by context' or Kuiper's (1994) 'instant-by-instant dealing of incoherent student ideas' are piecemeal, instant-by-instant gradual modification approaches to conceptual change and these approaches have become very popular. For example, von Glasersfeld (1995) argued that a significant change in the nature of and relationship between concepts can occur through 're-conceptualisation': from 'force implies motion' to 'force implies acceleration'.…”
Section: Is Conceptual Change Dramatic or 'Instant-by Instant'? Lookimentioning
confidence: 99%