2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-019-09564-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only survey item in which we found a significant difference between BLNP and non-BLNP students was the time spent with instructors, where BLNP students chose the option "greatly decreased" less often. Previous studies show that BLNP students often have more interactions with faculty members compared to white students, although they also have negative interactions with faculty members more often (Lundberg and Schreiner, 2004;Park et al, 2020). Still, their greater experience of interacting with faculty members might have prepared them better to communicate with instructors during emergency remote learning.…”
Section: Lack Of Hands-on Learningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The only survey item in which we found a significant difference between BLNP and non-BLNP students was the time spent with instructors, where BLNP students chose the option "greatly decreased" less often. Previous studies show that BLNP students often have more interactions with faculty members compared to white students, although they also have negative interactions with faculty members more often (Lundberg and Schreiner, 2004;Park et al, 2020). Still, their greater experience of interacting with faculty members might have prepared them better to communicate with instructors during emergency remote learning.…”
Section: Lack Of Hands-on Learningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The only survey item in which we found a significant difference between BLNP and non-BLNP students was the time spent with instructors, where BLNP students chose the option “greatly decreased” less often. Previous studies show that BLNP students often have more interactions with faculty members compared to white students, although they also have negative interactions with faculty members more often [72,73]. Still, their greater experience of interacting with faculty members might have prepared them better to communicate with instructors during emergency remote learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decades of campus climate research have documented that Black students at PWIs consistently report more negative perceptions of the university environment and endorse higher rates of racial marginalization, harassment, and discrimination compared with their White peers (Griffith et al, 2019;Harper & Hurtado, 2007;Pieterse et al, 2010). This persistent and differential mistreatment of Black college students is perpetuated by White peers, faculty, and staff (McCabe, 2009;Park et al, 2019). Per the PSC framework (Gloria & Castellanos, 2003), Black students' perceptions of the university environment at PWIs is a cultural variable that needs attention considering that their evaluation of the campus offer important insights for contextualizing their academic outcomes and experiences on campus.…”
Section: Cultural Variables and Black Students' Academic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty members and practitioners should focus on the quality of the relationships they establish with Black college students. Park et al (2019) found that Black students experienced racism at the hands of faculty, thus getting faculty to address racist behavior must be a starting point to improving student-faculty relationships. Although most faculty and their institutions express a desire to embrace diversity and avoid being labeled racist, institutions must take racist behavior by White faculty, staff, and students seriously (Cabrera et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%