1972
DOI: 10.2307/1250980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale is comprised of nine, 7-point bipolar adjective items designed to represent the dimensions of Moral Equity (fair/unfair, just/unjust, morally right/not morally right, acceptable to my family/unacceptable to my family), Relativism (culturally acceptable/culturally unacceptable, traditionally acceptable /traditionally unacceptable), which have been relabeled as Ethical Relativism to distinguish this variable from Forsyth's relativism dimension of ethical ideology, 1 and Contractualism (violates an unwritten contract/does not violate an unwritten contract, violates an unspoken promise/does not violate an unspoken promise). In addition to the Reidenbach et al (1991) items, the questionnaire included a 7-point univariate ethical/unethical scale as a global measure of ethical judgment as per Hawkins and Cocanougher (1972). The multidimensional ethics scale appeared after each of the scenarios to be evaluated, preceded by the prompt " …”
Section: Relationship Of Ideology To Ethical Judgments Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale is comprised of nine, 7-point bipolar adjective items designed to represent the dimensions of Moral Equity (fair/unfair, just/unjust, morally right/not morally right, acceptable to my family/unacceptable to my family), Relativism (culturally acceptable/culturally unacceptable, traditionally acceptable /traditionally unacceptable), which have been relabeled as Ethical Relativism to distinguish this variable from Forsyth's relativism dimension of ethical ideology, 1 and Contractualism (violates an unwritten contract/does not violate an unwritten contract, violates an unspoken promise/does not violate an unspoken promise). In addition to the Reidenbach et al (1991) items, the questionnaire included a 7-point univariate ethical/unethical scale as a global measure of ethical judgment as per Hawkins and Cocanougher (1972). The multidimensional ethics scale appeared after each of the scenarios to be evaluated, preceded by the prompt " …”
Section: Relationship Of Ideology To Ethical Judgments Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawkins (1972) apresenta uma pesquisa junto a alunos de graduação de Administração e de outras áreas, e conclui que os primeiros se mostravam mais tolerantes em relação a práticas "questionáveis" por parte de empresas. Farmer (1977), em Would you Want your Son to Marry a Marketing Lady?…”
Section: Fátima Cristina Trindade Bacellar and Ana Akemi Ikedaunclassified
“…Uma visão crítica do Marketing nos parece indispensável, sobretudo quando se vê os abusos praticados por algumas empresas e se levanta a questão da ética. E esse assunto tampouco é novo, tendo sido tratado por inúmeros autores para denunciar os ataques que a disciplina sofre (MANISCHEWITZ; STUART, 1962;FARMER, 1967;1977), enfatizar as devidas respostas aos ataques sofridos (LAVIDGE, 1970;BELL;EMORY, 1971;STIDSEN;SCHUTTE, 1972;STEINER, 1976), estruturar um modelo de ética para a disciplina (BARTELS, 1967;HUNT, 1976), avaliar a ética de seus praticantes e estudantes (HAWKINS, 1972) e, por fi m, sugerir formas de atenuar eventuais imagens negativas advindas de práticas indevidas por algumas empresas ou executivos individuais.…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified
“…1976), avaliar a ética de seus praticantes e estudantes (HAWKINS, 1972;HUNT e CHOMKO, 1984) e para sugerir formas de atenuar eventuais imagens negativas advindas de práticas indevidas por empresas ou executivos individuais (HOGNER, 1996).…”
Section: Ensinar Marketing Na Visão De Seus Professoresunclassified