2022
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2022.2121911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student assessment literacy: indicators and domains from the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the effectiveness of using social media for assessment purposes depends largely on students’ effective engagement in assessment ( Miller and Olthouse, 2013 ; Annamalai and Jaganathan, 2017 ). This means that students should have a certain level of assessment knowledge and skills, known as assessment literacy ( Hannigan et al, 2022 ), to understand the purpose and aim of assessment, and the processes required to optimize the impact of their engagement in assessment on their learning. In our findings, students’ ability to engage in peer assessment is limited by their insufficient feedback literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirdly, the effectiveness of using social media for assessment purposes depends largely on students’ effective engagement in assessment ( Miller and Olthouse, 2013 ; Annamalai and Jaganathan, 2017 ). This means that students should have a certain level of assessment knowledge and skills, known as assessment literacy ( Hannigan et al, 2022 ), to understand the purpose and aim of assessment, and the processes required to optimize the impact of their engagement in assessment on their learning. In our findings, students’ ability to engage in peer assessment is limited by their insufficient feedback literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design, implementation, and participation of students in the assessment process are critical for its effectiveness. There is a growing consensus in education that teaching, learning and assessing should aim to foster and develop students to actively engage, participate, contribute to, reflect on and evaluate their learning approaches and outcomes ( Hannigan et al, 2022 ). Moreover, the social interactions and the dialogic nature of assessment ( Ruiz-Primo, 2011 ), particularly eliciting and giving feedback, as conceptualized from a Vygotskian perspective, calls for student agency in the learning space and the necessity of knowledge exchange, regardless of the type of assessment in use.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hannigan et al (2022) point out, the peer assessment process requires an evaluative literacy characterized by 45 indicators grouped into 6 dimensions, namely: general knowledge of assessment, development of strategies to engage in assessment, active engagement in assessment, monitoring learning progress, engagement in re ective practice; and disposition in assessment.…”
Section: Peer Assessment Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain amount of evaluative literacy (Hannigan et al, 2022) and feedback (Carless & Boud, 2018) is essential for this understanding and application. Part of the results found could be attributed to a lack of literacy (Yan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%