Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of instituting a formalized bedside skills evaluation (BSE) for 3rd-year medical students on the neurology clerkship.Methods: A neurologic BSE was developed for 3rd -year neurology clerks at the University of Rochester for the 2012-2014 academic years. Faculty directly observed 189 students completing a full history and neurologic examination on real inpatients. Mock grades were calculated utilizing the BSE in the final grade, and number of students with a grade difference was determined when compared to true grade. Correlation was explored between the BSE and clinical scores, National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores, case complexity, and true final grades. A survey was administered to students to assess their clinical skills exposure and the usefulness of the BSE.Results: Faculty completed and submitted a BSE form for 88.3% of students. There was a mock final grade change for 13.2% of students. Correlation coefficients between BSE score and clinical score/NBME score were 0.36 and 0.35, respectively. A statistically significant effect of BSE was found on final clerkship grade (F 2,186 5 31.9, p , 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between BSE score and differing case complexities.Conclusions: Incorporating a formal faculty-observed BSE into the 3rd year neurology clerkship was feasible. Low correlation between BSE score and other evaluations indicated a unique measurement to contribute to student grade. Using real patients with differing case complexity did not alter the grade. In 1976, Engel wrote, in an editorial in JAMA, that "relatively little time is devoted to supervised instruction in interviewing and physical examination,"1 lamenting the academic model in which faculty made clinical decisions based on trainee evaluations without specific knowledge of the reporter's clinical competence. Since then, the model for trainee assessment has not changed dramatically.2 In a United States Medical Licensing Examination report, 40% of students stated that they were observed #4 times by faculty while performing history and examinations during medical school.3 An Association of American Medical Colleges survey found that 27% of students reported never being observed by a faculty member while performing history and physicals. 4 The current medical education system generally utilizes narrative evaluations and written examinations to inform student grades, although research suggests that multiple assessment methods are better. 5 In neurology, there has been an increase in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) in medical students' education, but feedback is primarily provided by standardized patients rather than faculty. 6,7 Few studies have examined the feasibility and utility of medical student bedside clinical evaluations during the neurology clerkship. Schmahmann et al. 8 reported on an experience with a beside examination exercise and Lukas et al. 6 described utilizing an OSCE, but neither approach included direct faculty obser...