Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education

Abstract

Background A breadth of evidence supports that academic dishonesty is prevalent among higher education students, including students in health sciences educational programs. Research suggest individuals who engage in academic dishonesty may continue to exhibit unethical behaviors in professional practice. Thus, it is imperative to appropriately address lapses in academic dishonesty among health sciences students to ensure the future safety of patients. However, students and faculty have varying perceptions of what constitutes academic dishonesty and the seriousness of breaches in academic dishonesty. The purpose of this study is to gain health sciences faculty and students’ perceptions on the appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity. Methods Faculty and students from different health care disciplines were asked to complete the anonymous survey in which 10 different academic (non-clinical) and clinical scenarios were presented. For each scenario, students or faculty needed to address their concern and assign an academic consequence that they considered appropriate (ranked from no consequence to dismissal). A mixed-effects model was used to assess the difference of questionnaire scores between subgroups. The study was completed in the Spring of 2017. Results A total of 185 faculty and 295 students completed the electronic survey. Across all survey questions (clinical and non-clinical), the perceived severity of the behavior predicted the consequence chosen by the respondent, indicating that both faculty and students assigned what they felt to be appropriate consequences directly based on their values and perceptions. Both faculty and students show congruence in their opinions regarding the perceived seriousness of clinical cases ( p = 0.220) and the recommended consequences assigned to such lapses ( p = 0.110). However, faculty and students statistically significantly disagreed in their perception of the severity of non-clinical academic dishonesty scenarios and recommended consequences ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Our research supports the need for collaborative work between faculty and students in putting forth clear guidelines on how to manage and uphold rules related to lapses in academic integrity not only for non-clinical situations, but especially for clinical ones in a health care setting. Recommendations from this research include using an honor code utilized in clinical settings.

Assessing the Academic integrity among University Students in Pakistan

“…The second subtheme is the teachers' role as protectors of academic integrity. It is thought that teachers are the first line of defense against academic misconduct (Keener, et al, 2019). Students' perceptions and experience depend on the teacher's level of commitment towards teaching, understanding students, and adherence to university rules and regulations.…”

“…It is widely reported by students and in empirical studies, that the teacher's role in shaping academic integrity is vital (Caldwell, 2010;Peters, Boies, & Morin, 2019). Besides this, teachers are the first line of defense against academic misconduct (Keener, et al, 2019). Similarly, it was reported in a multi-method study that the best methods to prevent academic misconduct is through faculty training and support (Hill, 2010).…”

Academic integrity and the implementation of the honour code in the clinical training of undergraduate dental students

“…McCabe and Treviño (1993) recommended that students must participate in the development and implementation of the honour code to be effective and that academic integrity must be a priority in the institution and must be communicated clearly to students. Involvement of students or collaborative work between staff and students was supported in developing guidelines and policies for enforcing academic integrity and the honour code inclusive of the clinical setting (Graham et al 2016;Keener et al 2019).…”

Exploring the Link between Academic Dishonesty and Economic Delinquency: A Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Approach

“…Using a survey of 185 faculty and 295 students, other authors found a significant difference in perception and attitudes between students and faculty when it comes to assessing the consequences and implication of academic dishonesty [20].…”