Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STS beyond the “modern infrastructure ideal”: Extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
119
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, understanding the urban geography of electricity In both cases, STT usefully demonstrated links between technology and its social context, including crucially the politics of infrastructure operation and transformation. Yet two key limitations which challenge its application across postcolonial urban worlds became evident: the assumption of a universal (and formalized) infrastructure system (FURLONG 2014;VARLEY, 2013) and the largely apolitical approach, including the assumption of a benevolent state with which actors can cooperatively engage towards more sustainable, just transitions, particular in sociotechnical transition theory (LAWHON and MURPHY, 2012).…”
Section: Unlearning Infrastructure: Identifying Assumptions To Make Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, understanding the urban geography of electricity In both cases, STT usefully demonstrated links between technology and its social context, including crucially the politics of infrastructure operation and transformation. Yet two key limitations which challenge its application across postcolonial urban worlds became evident: the assumption of a universal (and formalized) infrastructure system (FURLONG 2014;VARLEY, 2013) and the largely apolitical approach, including the assumption of a benevolent state with which actors can cooperatively engage towards more sustainable, just transitions, particular in sociotechnical transition theory (LAWHON and MURPHY, 2012).…”
Section: Unlearning Infrastructure: Identifying Assumptions To Make Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this project engages with the broad work in the politics of infrastructure (see e.g. Graham and Marvin, ; Holston, ; Truelove, ; Carse, ; Furlong, ; Silver, ; Barnes, ; Anand, ) through a consideration of how the urban socio‐natural landscape is held together through processes of maintenance and repair that cut across binaries of water and land (Thrift, ; Graham and Thrift, ; Mathur and da Cunha, ; Mandelman, ; Barnes, ). In doing so, the article engages with the nature of contemporary governance in São Paulo and calls for further attention into what Angel and Loftus () provocatively refer to as the ‘the set of socio‐ecological relations that goes by the name of the state’ (see also Angel, ; Harris, ).…”
Section: Methods and Conceptual Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Benjamin, 2008;Sundaram, 2009) The 'archipelago' (Bakker, 2003) condition of infrastructure systems calls for a view beyond the 'modern infrastructure ideal'. (Furlong, 2014) For instance, in his ethnography of the water supply system in a suburban settlement in Mumbai, Nonetheless, we do know that the much-desired data-driven systems of the smart cities will have to coexist and interact with the present infrastructure systems. [3] While data-driven imaginaries boast of integrated modes of knowledge production, the infrastructural conditions will possibly only allow new and old systems to co-produce hybrids which are driven by more things than data alone.…”
Section: Indian Techno-urban Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%