2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Struvite precipitation in anaerobic swine lagoon liquid: effect of pH and Mg:P ratio and determination of rate constant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
188
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
188
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If ammonia is removed from the lagoon wastewater prior to chlorination, the disinfection efficiency may be greatly improved because free chlorine has a much stronger disinfection potential than monochloramine. One potential mechanism of ammonia removal is the precipitation of struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate, MgNH 4 PO 4 Á 6H 2 O), a promising technology for both N and P removal from anaerobic swine lagoon effluent (Nelson et al, 2003). In addition, the retention time of the swine wastewater is as long as several months due to the small flow rate of the wastes into the anaerobic lagoons, as informed by the CAFOs operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If ammonia is removed from the lagoon wastewater prior to chlorination, the disinfection efficiency may be greatly improved because free chlorine has a much stronger disinfection potential than monochloramine. One potential mechanism of ammonia removal is the precipitation of struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate, MgNH 4 PO 4 Á 6H 2 O), a promising technology for both N and P removal from anaerobic swine lagoon effluent (Nelson et al, 2003). In addition, the retention time of the swine wastewater is as long as several months due to the small flow rate of the wastes into the anaerobic lagoons, as informed by the CAFOs operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P recovery efficiency is generally high and often >90% (Table 1) with municipal wastewater averaging 95% (Pastor et al, 2010;Uysal et al, 2010) and landfill leachate (Iaconi et al, 2010), human urine (Ganrot et al, 2007) and carmine dye industry (Chimenos et al, 2003) wastewater processes reporting 100% recovery. Struvite also captures NH 4 + with recovery efficiency as high as 98% for municipal wastewater and semiconductor wastewater (Suschka and Poplawski, 2003;Kim et al, 2009 (Demirer et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2011), swine manure (Burns et al, 2001(Burns et al, , 2003Nelson et al, 2003;Suzuki et al, 2007;Perera et al, 2007;Ryu and Lee, 2010;Liu et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012), poultry manure (Yetilmezsoy et al, 2009) and cattle urine (Prabhu and Mutnuri, 2014 The high P content of manure makes it a suitable source, however its available P fraction remains only in the range of 35% (poultry manure) to 63% (dairy manure) of total P (Barnett, 1994). P predominantly present in particulate form remains unavailable for recovery (Sharpley and Moyer, 2000;Chapuis-Lardy et al, 2003).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Struvite by mass is 44% crystal water, 39% phosphate, 10% magnesium, and 7% ammonium (Gell et al, 2011) and its precipitation requires the presence of three ionic species, magnesium (Mg ) in an alkaline solution with an optimum molar ratio of 1:1:1 (Rahaman et al, 2008). The factors that govern the precipitation of struvite in P-rich sources include: pH, the ionic strength of solution (Nelson et al, 2003), the presence of impurities or non-participating ions (Le Corre, 2007), the mixing energy (Wang et al, 2006), the residence time of suspension during crystallization and the nature of the reactor used for crystallization (Koralewska et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of struvite product were observed by SEM (JEOL JSM 6510), XRD (Shimadzu XRD 600), and FTIR (Shimadzu IR Prestige21). In order to study the mechanism of struvite formation, the first-order kinetic model was used to the experimental results as per method proposed by Rahman et al [13], Nelson et al [14], and Quintana et al [15]. figure 1a, figure 1b, and figure 1c, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%