1993
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270192008680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of bis(triphenylphosphine)gold(I) hexafluorophosphate, [Au(PPh3)2]PF6 (1), and bis(triphenylphosphine)gold(I) nitrate, [Au(PPh3)2]NO3 (2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a decrease in the ratio between the π‐acceptor and σ‐donor abilities of the nitrile donors with respect to, for example, the isonitrile and CO ligands 24. Overall, the Au–donor separations and the interligand angles in compounds 3 and 3′ are similar to those reported previously for [Ph 3 PAu(NCMe)][SbF 6 ]25 and similar complexes with 2‐phosphanylbiphenyl ligands (type B in Scheme ),25, 26 while the AuP bonds in 4 a compare well with the data determined for complexes [Au(PR 3 ) 2 ]X, in which R/X=Me/PF 6 ,27 Ph/NTf 2 ,28 Ph/NO 3 29 and FcCH 2 PPh 2 /ClO 4 (Fc=ferrocenyl) 30…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This corresponds to a decrease in the ratio between the π‐acceptor and σ‐donor abilities of the nitrile donors with respect to, for example, the isonitrile and CO ligands 24. Overall, the Au–donor separations and the interligand angles in compounds 3 and 3′ are similar to those reported previously for [Ph 3 PAu(NCMe)][SbF 6 ]25 and similar complexes with 2‐phosphanylbiphenyl ligands (type B in Scheme ),25, 26 while the AuP bonds in 4 a compare well with the data determined for complexes [Au(PR 3 ) 2 ]X, in which R/X=Me/PF 6 ,27 Ph/NTf 2 ,28 Ph/NO 3 29 and FcCH 2 PPh 2 /ClO 4 (Fc=ferrocenyl) 30…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All four F atoms in the BF4-anion are disordered. Two other [Au(PPh3)z]+X--type structures have been reported recently (X = NO3, PF6; Staples, King, Khan, Winpenny & Fackler, 1993). Fig.…”
Section: ]+[Bf4] - (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cation shown in Figure , the two Au–P bond lengths are found to be 2.279(3) Å and 2.291(3) Å; the P–Au–P bond angle was determined as 166.91(10)° and is thus contracted from the ideal linear geometry. The related phosphine complex [Au(PPh 3 ) 2 ]PF 6 has Au–P bond lengths of 2.314(2) Å and 2.309(2) Å and a P–Au–P bond angle of 177.4(1)°; for [Au(PPh 3 ) 2 ]NO 3 the corresponding values are 2.312(4) Å and 2.311(2) Å, and 171.1(2)° . Thus, the gold–phosphonite bond lengths are shorter than in the related arylphosphine complexes, and the smaller P–Au–P bond angle is perhaps a consequence of the bulky 3,3′‐dimethylbiphenoxy moiety of the ligand, although for [Au(PPh 3 ) 2 ]BF 4 the value is 167.3(1)°, so care must be taken when drawing conclusions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%