1996
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270195012376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Au(PPh3)2]+[BF4]−

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Au–P bond lengths are 2.314(4) Å and 2.315(4) Å, and the gold coordination angle is 162.52(13)°. This compares well to values reported for closely related compounds such as, for example, [Au(PPh 3 ) 2 ][BF 4 ], which exhibits Au–P bond lengths of 2.321(3) Å and 2.322(3) Å and aP–Au–P angle of 167.3(1)° 33. The fairly pronounced, but not unusual, deviation of the P–Au–P unit from linearity in[Au( 4 ‐κ 2 P , P )][SbF 6 ] is neither due to Au···F nor to Au···N contacts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Au–P bond lengths are 2.314(4) Å and 2.315(4) Å, and the gold coordination angle is 162.52(13)°. This compares well to values reported for closely related compounds such as, for example, [Au(PPh 3 ) 2 ][BF 4 ], which exhibits Au–P bond lengths of 2.321(3) Å and 2.322(3) Å and aP–Au–P angle of 167.3(1)° 33. The fairly pronounced, but not unusual, deviation of the P–Au–P unit from linearity in[Au( 4 ‐κ 2 P , P )][SbF 6 ] is neither due to Au···F nor to Au···N contacts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The P1-Au1-P2 angle is widened to 151.78(5)8, whereas the P-Au-Cl angles are squeezed together to 105.62(5)8 and 102.59(6)8, and clearly differ from the ideal angle of 1208. Although the AuÀP bond lengths are in the usual range (P1ÀAu1 2.324(2) and P2ÀAu1 2.330(2) ), compared with [(Ph 3 P) 2 Au] [BF 4 ], [73] the AuÀCl distance of 2.709(2) is remarkably long and thus points to a weak bond. The bond length is considerably longer than for typical AuCl complexes (see compound 1 for example), as well as for trigonal planar compounds such as [AuCl(PPh 3 ) 2 ] (d(AuÀCl) = 2.5257 ) [74] and lies in the range between their atoms' covalent (2.38 ) [75] and Van der Waals radii (3.4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anion is crystallo graphically disordered, but the positioning of the fluorine atoms could be resolved in a split model calculation. The situation is similar for the phos phorus analogue [9]. The main difference between the two structures (with Ph^P and Ph^As ligands) is the variation in the Au-E and C-E distances (E = P, As).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The crystals are monoclinic, space group C2/c, with 8 formula units in the unit cell. The com pound is thus isomorphous with the corresponding triphznylphosphine complex [9]. The lattice con tains bis(triphenylarsine)gold(I) cations loosely as sociated with the tetrafluoroborate anions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%