2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-008-9210-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures and processes in spontaneous ADR reporting systems: a comparative study of Australia and Denmark

Abstract: The two systems differ with regard to reporting requirements, report handling, resources being spent and information exchange with the environment. In Denmark, learning about ADRs primarily takes place in the safety divisions of the pharmaceutical companies and the authorities have no control over the knowledge creation process. In Australia, more learning and control of the knowledge is present than in Denmark.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reporting of ADRs has been obligatory in Denmark since 1 May 1968 [25]. Initially, only physicians were covered by the obligation; however, in 1972, dentists were also required to report ADRs.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reporting of ADRs has been obligatory in Denmark since 1 May 1968 [25]. Initially, only physicians were covered by the obligation; however, in 1972, dentists were also required to report ADRs.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, only physicians were covered by the obligation; however, in 1972, dentists were also required to report ADRs. Since 1995, drug manufacturers have been obliged to keep registers of suspected and demonstrated ADRs and to make these available to the authorities [25]. Since July 2003, consumers have been able to report ADRs directly to the authorities.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 Annual reporting rates of between 300-500 reports per 1,000,000 population had been reported in Australia, Denmark, France, Ireland, Sweden and UK. 5,6 Although reporting rates of adverse drug reactions by healthcare professionals had not been studied in Ghana, studies in Nigeria had reporting rates of between 2% to 32%. 7,9 This is less than reporting rates of 47% to 77% identified by Belton, et al 1997 in some European countries with well-established spontaneous reporting systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, spontaneous systems for the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were established in some well developed countries. The major purposes of these systems are to detect unknown or poorly understood adverse effects of medicines [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%